Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : CYBR CyberCare the new look of healthcare -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (222)	2/26/2000 8:57:00 PM
From: Patrick Lauder	Respond to of 3392

Auric, Just answer the question put to you.... I will re-post the questions! What are you saying,.... that CYBR is not that important to ING Barings as we would like to think? So What! That Conn issued a Strong Buy Recommendation which would possibly benefit CYBR which would pay less interest on the debentures? So What! How does that affect the companies product that has been tested by the DOD and Mayo and now Iowa, and is being ordered in the US and China, and that could change the way the world does medicine in the future. How does what you state change all that??? Pat

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (222)	2/27/2000 3:52:00 PM
From: Patrick Lauder	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3392

Auric, I have e-mailed all your posts concerning CYBR to CYBR-Care the company, asking that their lawyers look them over. Hopefully they can find something illegal in anything you have said about their company. I will also send the same e-mail to the SEC as soon as I get the right e-mail address,... latest tomorrow,.... you are being monitored. Keep adding Auric, I will send off your posts as you deliver them. Pat

To: Sir Auric Goldfinger who wrote (222)	2/27/2000 6:22:00 PM
From: Patrick Lauder	Respond to of 3392

Auric, This is about the company that CYBR did a deal with in Hong Kong. Did some research on Shanghai Industrial. Seems like a solid red chip company, making money, declaring dividends and all. I quote from one report. "Salomon Brothers recommends three key red chips which meet these requirements: China Resources Enterprise, Shanghai Industrial Holdings Ltd and Guangnan (Holdings) Ltd. With China Resources and Shanghai Industrial, parentage lends further weight to their value. China Resources answers to the Ministry of Foreign Trade and Economic Co-operation, while the Shanghai municipal government is the parent of Shanghai Industrial. Salomon Brothers expects that stock, which listed last year, to have a particularly bright future. Shanghai is the financial centre of China, but work needs to be done to fully develop that role. The city needs better infrastructure, telecommunications, funds and joint venture partners brought in - a big share of it is expected to be done through Shanghai Industrial, says Lu." Appears SIIC is doing well on the GEM (HK equivalent of Nasdaq). Pretty powerful partners. Pat