SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (95498)2/28/2000
From: Gary Ng  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573094
 
Jozef, now I understand you meaning.

What I would do is to skip the three quarters of 99 for
quarter to quarter comparison as that were some lousy
quarters to compare with.

What I would interested to see is the Q498 vs Q499 unit
shipment as Q498 was the best quarter for AMD for the past few years(except Q499).

For revenue, you are comparing Intel and AMD's performance relative to themselves which I won't comment as that has nothing to do with market share, IMO.

Gary



To: Joe NYC who wrote (95498)2/28/2000 12:57:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1573094
 
Joe - Re: "Units (mil)
99q3 99q4 Increase
AMD 4.5 6.0 33%
Intel ??? ???

I hope Paul, PB or Elmer can fill in the blanks."

You forgot AMD Q498 Unit Sales - 5.5 Million - so AMD's Q498 - Q499 increase was only 9% !!!!!!

However - your attempt to CONFUSE by clever use of the WRONG DATA was admirable for a DESPERATE AMDroid !

Paul


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News