Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mani1 who wrote (95526)	2/28/2000 1:03:00 AM
From: Gary Ng	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573221

Mani, Re: Lets see if you remember to compare the Q1 numbers year over year, once they are out. IMO, these quarter over quarter (even not subsequent one) are very tricky especially for AMD which had a history of up and down frequently. May be a year to year(full year) is more meaningful. Gary

To: Mani1 who wrote (95526)	2/28/2000 1:24:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573221

Mani - Re: "Lets see if you remember to compare the Q1 numbers year over year, once they are out." You are reminding us all of AMD's PITIFUL 1999 Q1 - And Q2 - quarters. Thank you. They indeed were DISGUSTING !!! I'm sure you remember - as I DO - AMD's 3 EARNINGS WARNINGS in Q1 and Q2 of last year - what a THRILL FOR AMD investors ! You might also remind us how steady Intel's sales ramp has been over the years - probably a good reason for Intel setting 17 new ALL TIME HIGH's since Novemebr of 1999. Paul