SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Ask Michael Burke -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Knighty Tin who wrote (76687)2/28/2000 1:36:00 PM
From: Tommaso  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
What will be fun to watch is if we get a frenetic rotation round and round between NASDAQ stocks and a declining Dow. What with the commissions skimmed off, plus any money that is kept on the sidelines even temporarily, there could be an enormous deflation of the bubble very fast.

But of course this is what they call in the financial reports "forward-looking" thinking.



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (76687)2/28/2000 1:56:00 PM
From: Rob Fritz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Michael, do you have an opinion on any of the assisted living companies? I'm looking at Sunrise (SNRZ), Alterra (ALI), and Emeritus (ESC). Thanks in advance. Rob



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (76687)2/28/2000 1:56:00 PM
From: Kailash  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 132070
 
Good news for Intel? Cambridge physicists have come up with a new chip technology:

"most existing electronic chips can fit up to 6.6 million transistors (the basic building blocks of all microchips) into one square centimetre.

"But we have demonstrated a device that can fit 5,500 million transistors into a similar area. We estimate in future years this could increase to 250,000 million transistors.

news.bbc.co.uk



To: Knighty Tin who wrote (76687)2/28/2000 3:47:00 PM
From: Knighty Tin  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 132070
 
To All, This must be why MU is up today. <g> techweb.com Remember the folks who said that supply would be tight for years?