SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: steve harris who wrote (95660)2/28/2000 3:06:00 PM
From: ptanner  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1573696
 
steve, re: Jan Retail Sales

<Is this the same measurement Mercury was using when AMD was 17%?>

Nope. 17% was total market share for 4Q99 (preliminary estimate is all I have seen) which was up from 12.5% in 3Q99.

Retail share history (See siliconinvestor.com

         AUG   OCT   JAN
Intel 44.4 63 63
AMD 42.5 33 37
Cyrix 13.1 4 0


The very impressive part of the January retail report was that AMD's average system price was higher than Intel's.

PT



To: steve harris who wrote (95660)2/28/2000 4:29:00 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1573696
 
ted,

WOW

And Intel lost some? Intel was 67%??


Steve,

Amazing, huh? I was wondering when the thread would pick up on that article. Now we know why Sanders made his preannouncement!

ted



To: steve harris who wrote (95660)2/28/2000 4:32:00 PM
From: Paul Engel  Respond to of 1573696
 
st*vi* - Our Little SI Den Mommy - Bam Bam McMannis asked me to ask you - WHy did AMD take a $2 DUMP near the close of the market today?

Bam Bam thinks you have all the answers about closing activity - so clue us in on this AMD dumper !!!

Paul