SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Point and Figure Charting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Smooth Drive who wrote (24740)2/29/2000 7:20:00 AM
From: Atin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 34827
 
Eric, does the Chartcraft style work with percent charts?

I am reading "Trading Systems and Methods" by Perry Kaufman where he does vertical counts by:

V(up) = lowest box + (number of boxes in the first reversal x minimum number of boxes in a chart reversal);

V(down) = highest box + (number of boxes in the first reversal x minimum number of boxes in a chart reversal);

Doesn't seem to care about double tops.

I think I'm just going to use this for now, and put it on the reversal column. Now I just need to figure out how to write text with an up/down orientation so I can just put it at the top of the column . . .

-Atin



To: Smooth Drive who wrote (24740)2/29/2000 8:38:00 AM
From: Atin  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 34827
 
Vertical counts using the Chartcraft system:

If my low is at 83, the next column of Xs has 13 columns, the calculation goes (for a 3 box reversal):

83 + (box size * (13 * 3.0)) = $122.

Or should it be $144 because once we went over 100, the box sizes become 2, so the 22 boxes above 100 are really worth 2 boxes each? Turns out it is easier for me to calculate $144 but I have the feeling that the Chartcraft method wimps out and uses 122 instead :-)

-Atin