Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (95879)	2/29/2000 3:23:00 PM
From: steve harris	Respond to of 1572560

Ten, you forgot your standard disclaimer: "I am an Intel employee" Are you posting from Intel facilities? steve

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (95879)	2/29/2000 5:19:00 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1572560

Tench, You should have bought RMBS when I told you....up 50 today! ted

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (95879)	2/29/2000 5:24:00 PM
From: Monica Detwiler	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1572560

Tenchusatsu - You wrote Although people ridicule the lateness of Itanium, the fact is that it will be here at least a year and a half before Sledgehammer. Perhaps Jerry Sanders knows this as well, which is why he's spreading anti-Itanium FUD in a (futile) effort to scare developers away from IA-64.. Much of the software industry has committed to the Intel 64 bit Itanium - and most hardware developers have also. Has AMD announced similar support for their 64 bit effort - or are they going it alone at this point? Actually, wouldn't the Sledgehammer make a wonderful game machine? Monica