SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : JDS Uniphase (JDSU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nichols who wrote (6939)2/29/2000 4:34:00 PM
From: Guy Gordon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 24042
 
RE "Gotta disagree..."

Well, that's why it's a market. :-)

Funny you mention CSCO. That's one I've been in for years. The last time it broke one of my trendlines was Fall of 1998, in the Asian Financial Crisis. That one took me by surprise. When the Thai Bhat collapsed I convinced myself that it wouldn't matter. Who the hell cares about the Bhat? Then the market collapsed around me. I figured it was far, far overdone, and just held on.

None the less, you need to make two good decisions about a stock -- when to buy, and when to sell. I try to decide which stock to buy based on fundamentals, and when to buy & sell based on trendlines. That means if a stock with good fundamentals starts down, I sell it, and then look for a new entry point (hopefully lower).

It sounds nice to say "sell when the fundamentals change", but it's damned difficult to put into practice. They usually don't change all that rapidly. For example, PE ratio is a fundamental. As JDSU goes up, so does the PE. At what point has this changed enough for you to sell?

The best fundamental to watch is earnings & sales estimates. If those stop growing, get out. But then, everyone does look at those, so it's reflected in the stock price. If those fall, the stock will drop off its trend, causing me to sell.



To: Nichols who wrote (6939)2/29/2000 9:28:00 PM
From: barry fowler  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 24042
 
>> ). But selling that 900 pounder would have been a mistake

What if you had a "good" estimate of where those 50% corrections would be, and sold before, and then bought after the correction? Doing that every time would be kinda tough, but win or lose, people try it. I knew a guy making > 50% w/ that method back in the late '80 when the market was less volatile.