SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (2981)2/29/2000 8:56:00 PM
From: Mannie  Respond to of 5853
 
Jack-If you go to the GSTRF thread, there are several folks who have Globalstar phones, they say the quality is superb.

I agree that the cost is high, but the price is cheap to someone who has no other way to access a phone line. I agree that the phones will never be attractive to the average cell user, but that is not who the system is aimed to serve.

Globalstar has not signed up the projected number of users in the first few months, mostly due to a lack of handsets to sell. I believe they will be up to a million users (and profitability) quite quickly. Satellite communications, data, internet access will grow quickly over the coming years.

Scott



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (2981)2/29/2000 9:11:00 PM
From: UUplink  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5853
 
Have a look at the G* thread on SI if you would like direct info on customer experiences.

A key point is the economic value added by satellite telephoney today in developing areas of the world where no telephone service is available. Communication breeds economic opportunity and vice versa. Perhaps there may someday be cellular or wireline competition in the mining camps of Brazil or the outback of Australia. More likely IMO is that satellite systems will continue to offer the only viable service solution for many of these areas--particularly as satellite-based service costs decline (e.g. through cheaper launch vehicles, improved satellite technology, cheaper ground segment costs etc.)

There was even a story in the Washington Post a few weeks ago about a doctor working on the outskirts of Mexico City who used the satellite phone to stay in contact with his office because the local wireline service is so poor.



To: Jack Hartmann who wrote (2981)3/2/2000 12:32:00 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 5853
 
Excellent observations. I am trying to imagine who needs, and can afford, a cellphone that costs $1.70/minute U.S. but can't get to a land line. Let's see, the per capita GDP in Cambodia is $700, in Ethiopia, it's $560, while in China it's a whopping $3,600.