Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Superconductor Technologies : SCON -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Hua who wrote (553)	2/29/2000 10:17:00 PM
From: coachbobknight	Respond to of 903

yes...you are very right... i attempted to identify in my previous post that i was talking to robert when i made those comments...certainly they were not addressed to you...as you are enshrined in the si shorters' hall of fame for your prescient call of pcln to 50 by october '99...grin... mr. rose was very sure of his position in pcln...so sure of himself and his beliefs that we were scorned for bringing out the truth... tsk, tsk...

To: Tom Hua who wrote (553)	3/1/2000 8:25:00 AM
From: Robert Rose	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 903

Tom, I am not surprised to hear coach saying what he has about me. But I am surprised to see you saying this. We all, even you and coach, can be wrong about stocks on occasion. I have already admitted on this thread that you were right and I was wrong about pcln. As I've also already mentioned, I saw the light on that dog stock and got out before I lost money on it. As for scon, our current differing positions probably reflect timeframe more than anything. Your style is generally to go for ST swings, while mine is to ride a good stock over a longer period, ignoring ST volatility along the way. I think I've found a winner in scon. Good luck. Rob