Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (100078)	3/1/2000 6:54:00 AM
From: DRBES	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

re: "How low can Intel go? I'm looking for a good time to buy!!" MUCH, MUCH LOWER; and SOITAINLY not now!!!! DARBES

To: JDN who wrote (100078)	3/1/2000 7:16:00 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

JDN and Charles, re: Intel/Sun If a remember correctly, Intel claimed that Sun wasn't committing the resources it needed to Intel 64. Intel doesn't make a habit of dismissing markets where it can sell it's products, so I assume there must have been at least some truth to this. Now, reading between the lines, it sounds like Sun's customers may have put pressure on Sun to support Intel architecture. I personally do not see the benefit to Sun of customers using "free" Solaris on Intel 64, could you guys enlighten me? Note it wasn't a joint Sun/Intel press release. Wonder if we will hear something from Intel? And if not, what that means? John