SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (96052)3/1/2000 2:22:00 PM
From: Scot  Respond to of 1575955
 
It sounds like Merced is a serious dog on x86 applications

Jerry certainly thinks so...you have to wonder, is there an i840/rambust analogy here?

-Scot

Sanders reckons Intel's move to 64-bit is another example of its
willingness to bully customers onto new architectures. "Customers do not
want to go to new software and new operating systems because they're
using a new chip... Itanium, from what we have seen and heard will run
32-bit software, at best, as an 800MHz solution. It has a large die, it's
expensive and it's slow."



To: Scumbria who wrote (96052)3/1/2000 2:50:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575955
 
Scumbria, <It sounds like Merced is a serious dog on x86 applications>

To be fair, when asked whether Sledgehammer's 64-bit performance will be competitive against IA-64, Sanders dodged the question, just like Intel dodged the question regarding 32-bit performance on Itanium.

Tenchusatsu