SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (96170)3/1/2000 8:39:00 PM
From: Epinephrine  Respond to of 1572613
 
RE: <If you substitute IA-64 for Itanium, I agree. I think that Merced is a lousy IA-64 implementation, but McKinley will likely be much better.>

Scumbria,

Yes, I saw your previous post to Eric about IA-64/Merced/McKinley after I posted mine, consider it substituted :)

Thanks,

Epinephrine



To: Scumbria who wrote (96170)3/1/2000 10:06:00 PM
From: Joe NYC  Respond to of 1572613
 
I think that Merced is a lousy IA-64 implementation, but McKinley will likely be much better.

But what if Merced is such an embarrassment that nobody will want to touch McKinley? This is not the first time Intel tried to liberate itself from the IA. None of the previous attempts succeeded.

I may be proven wrong, but as of now, Merced has all of the signs of being a loser.

Joe


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News