Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Cents and Sensibility - Kimberly and Friends' Consortium -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: If only I'd held who wrote (81537)	3/2/2000 12:48:00 PM
From: SKARLOEY	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108040

JMAR - lol thanks mm's, got some more, i have so many shares now of jmar it is ridicules, in 4 accts, all on dips, will continue to buy on all new major dips, this is now going to make me more than i dreamed of when i first bought many many months ago...

To: If only I'd held who wrote (81537)	3/2/2000 12:49:00 PM
From: swisstrader	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 108040

PALM - think I will now go flush my Palm V down the toilet, which is where my shares have just gone...bye, bye!!

To: If only I'd held who wrote (81537)	3/2/2000 1:25:00 PM
From: sam	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108040

This is not a judgement about the PALM IPO whatsoever -- but IPO pricing is not really an indication of what the value of a company will be. Look at FDRY, ARBA, CMRC, AETH etc.... All priced somewhere below $40.00. And all are trading about 10 times the pricing. There are other considerations -- like making sure buyers can be easily lined up -- that leads underwriters to choose pricings well below the price the stock will be trading on the open market.