SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : 3Com Corporation (COMS) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: djpfive who wrote (40885)3/2/2000 1:36:00 PM
From: TonyL  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 45548
 
Quick Question...
If I wanted to buy PALMS today for long term investment, should I buy COMS at 87 or Palms at 105.
Thanks



To: djpfive who wrote (40885)3/2/2000 1:39:00 PM
From: kennbill  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 45548
 
Lets see.. CNBC partially owned by Microsoft... would that be the reason that they are conveniently misstating the truth??



To: djpfive who wrote (40885)3/2/2000 1:44:00 PM
From: Mort  Respond to of 45548
 
But there are so many people in the market that don't understand how to think about COMS, and this misunderstanding is aided by all the commentary on CNBC, where they keep talking about COMS as if it were already standing alone.<i/>

I agree, I have been watching Bloomberg TV and they keep saying things like the "sell off of the NAZ is being led by COMS since it spun off PALM".


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News