Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: HG who wrote (21594)	3/3/2000 6:38:00 AM
From: Rande Is	Respond to of 57584

Happy, Regarding COMS: That calculator is faulty. . .and does not consider many factors. . . one of which is the distribution of PALM shares later. . . What I like is that no matter what the PALM company is worth, the COMS company will always be worth COMS + 93% PALM. . .that is good for COMS, in that they have big bucks now to spend on R&D in an industry that is only in its first generation. Prior to the PALM spinoff, COMS was an OK company. Since all those bucks were generated for the company, virtually doubling their market cap overnight. . .[and remember they SOLD those shares, so they have the cash for the sale]. . now COMS is a fine company with loads of possibilities. . .through the PALM division and through the COMS products, which needed an injection of cash to keep them on the cutting edge. . . now they should sell-off their older tech, like Lucent and start anew. Thats what I see. Rande Is