To: Fred Thornell who wrote (39889 ) 3/2/2000 10:56:00 PM From: Suzanne Newsome Read Replies (1) | Respond to
Since this is Repost From RB Day, here's another one with my comments in bold:(Jim, if you have a name to call me, be a man and do it.) (Let's see. I defended Zeev Hed against anti-semitic attack. I brought up the concept of reverse split 2 weeks ago to show how it could help the company. I have decried Gordon's self-grant of 5 million shares. I have praised Gordon's savvy timing of PR's. I have objected to profanity and vulgarity. So you think I am a narrow-minded person. There is a contingent of very inexperienced "investors" on the RB TSIG thread who know almost nothing about this company. For example, how many times in the past 3 days has it been mentioned that the float is 100 million shares? In the weeks leading up to the SuperBowl, how many times was it shouted "JUST WAIT UNTIL THE SUPERBOWL AD!" All of these ideas persisted for weeks in spite of posts explaining the truth. Now what is their excuse? Ignorance? Inexperience? Evil? There is no group on the SI TSIG thread that compares to this subgroup of the RB TSIG thread. Whether or not that opinion represents narrow-mindedness, the people who read my posts can decide.) (Why are we always stating our pedigree on these threads? Some of the brightest, most perceptive investors I know have been here a fraction of the time I've been here. So what!) (Damn! It was all me, huh? I'd better enter the Federal Witness Program in the next 5 minutes now that this information is out!) You blasted Zeev and Ditch, but they both turned out to be right. (It's true that I debated Zeev and Ditch. But have they been totally right? They predicted total failure of the company. TSIG has not failed. I held my shares all the way down to $.032 and back up. Like Dixie, I bought more while it was sub-ten cents. I have absolutely no complaints about today's stock price. And very important for my future, another chunk of my shares qualify as long-term every few months. If I had listened to Zeev and Ditch, I would have sold in the $.20's, would have been too afraid to buy sub-$.10, and would have a fraction of the number of shares I own today. After the fat lady sings, the final verdict of who was right--Zeev and Ditch or the longs--can be determined.) And now since I've got a deja-vu experience going on, you've decided to once again ignore the history of this non producing company and belittle my concerns. (Jim, you have been making fun of me for weeks. This morning, I simply objected to the idea that Gordon, who is working like a dog, should take time out from performing critical duties to sit down and write a newsletter for you. You seem pretty good at dishing it out, but a little touchy when it comes to taking it. I guess name-calling is your real forte.) They (TSIG)continue to hide behind legalities. And then we're all shocked when a SEC document is filed. (Let me get this straight. Gordon et al are dirty, rotten, cheating, lying slobs and you hate them because they are following the law as stated in Marty's reference to the SEC sections. Gordon is a crook OR Gordon is protecting the company and its shareholders by abiding by SEC law. If the law doesn't exist, prove it. If the law doesn't apply, prove it. Marty has done half of the work for you. Jim, state the real, true basis of why Gordon is wrong or retract your blanket accusations.) (Jim, in your opinion, is this statement representative of what is posted by the RB trash?) (Off with his head!)
