Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Paul Engel who wrote (96503)	3/3/2000 2:27:00 AM
From: Charles R	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571690

<And now, Intel has SURPASSED AMD.> Yeah! In releasing vapors with amazing consistency. <Intel was RAPIDLY but QUIETLY catching up.> Yeah? So, you finally realized Intel fell behind and trying to catchup? Wow! <And you and SpryGuy and DUMbria and Stevie Blunder are DUMBFOUNDED in disbelief.> Yeah, not many people thought Intel will continue to stoop lower and lower and lower....

To: Paul Engel who wrote (96503)	3/3/2000 10:04:00 AM
From: Epinephrine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1571690

Paul <All the while you and SpryGuy and DUMbria and Stevie Blunder were patting yourselves on the back, laughing at Intel being so far behind AMD, Intel was RAPIDLY but QUIETLY catching up. And now, Intel has SURPASSED AMD.> I find it ironic that in the above quote you not only imply that I am an AMD cheerleader but you present a viewpoint that exposes the incredible depths of your hypocrisy by claiming that Intel has "caught up" with AMD by releasing their pre-production samples running on tweaked motherboards with tweaked cooling solutions in such limited quantities that they have to call them "special editions". You have no objectivity whatsoever, you are the epitome of a partisan cheerleader and you are an unabashed hypocrite for calling me one! <And you and SpryGuy and DUMbria and Stevie Blunder are DUMBFOUNDED in disbelief.> What I am dumbfounded in disbelief over is that you are willing to espouse such a BS launch. It proves that you are unwilling to view Intel through anything other than your Intel-rose colored glasses. This is not a real launch, and shipping "limited editions" that run on tweaked out infrastructure is not "production". Epinephrine PS: Special editions/Pre-Production/Production...Which word doesn't fit with the other two there. Weren't you trashing Scumbria earlier this week claiming that he was playing word games? You can CALL it production all you want but the fact is that Intel has admitted that the 1GHz Coppermines will be "special editions". That is not true production and you are playing word games which is something you were bashing Scumbria for less than a week or two ago thus proving once again how much of a hypocrite you are