Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (61410)	3/3/2000 3:07:00 PM
From: BigBull	Respond to of 95453

But John, don't you get it? CSCO's growth is so SEXY! Maybe they should rename the company - 36 24 36. <g>

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (61410)	3/3/2000 3:09:00 PM
From: The Ox	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 95453

1 year sales growth WM = 7% CSCO = 49% Gee, I wonder why the PE is higher?

To: Think4Yourself who wrote (61410)	3/3/2000 3:21:00 PM
From: Andrew Brockway	Respond to of 95453

John Q, Here lies the problem: I don't even bother to look at Cisco's EPS, PE, BV, etc.. You just hold it and watch the line on the chart move towards the top right! Really, the question is what to do with the tech "blue chips?" We're not talking about the companies with $20 mil of revenues and 10 bil market caps. I'm just not sure I can now liquidate all my tech to buy BR. Even when I bought FLC at $5 3/8 I worried about it going to $3 - I didn't have the balls to go 100% patch then and I don't have them now. Andrew