Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DanZ who wrote (7046)	3/3/2000 4:53:00 PM
From: Bill Wexler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Interesting how touts of fraud stocks always seem to find some way to spin the daily price action of their pet stocks as "bullish"...particularly on the down ramp of the pump and dump. You have some brilliant logic there Danny. The NAZ is motoring ahead, GUMM is at best flat every day and you interpret this as bullish. Gosh, I guess that would make NOK's move from 150 to 220 bearish (I'm long NOK).

To: DanZ who wrote (7046)	3/3/2000 5:24:00 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10293

Look, you can keep you Bollocks Bands. Here, I'll make it real simple, just look at this chart and tell me which way the general trend is: chart.bigcharts.com This a stock approaching the end of its selling season. It's like toy stock in December. Do you know what happens to toy stocks in December? Look one up and see. Let me suggest KIDE, the Pokemon licensing company, as a good example.

To: DanZ who wrote (7046)	3/3/2000 6:51:00 PM
From: Don Westermeyer	Respond to of 10293

Bouncing' off Bollinger bands means nothing bullish or bearish from a technical perspective. John Bollinger theory says only that the bands narrow, the stock is ready for a move (in either direction). Since these bands simply describe a variance around a moving average I fail to see why even that would work.