To: Rolla Coasta who wrote (9533 ) 3/6/2000 9:23:00 AM From: Liatris Spicata Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 9980
Ernest- Well please don't tell anybody , but the truth is I don't know a lot about Hong Kong. But seriously, I do understand there are a lot of poor people in Hong Kong, even though it has been an enormous wealth generator for decades. Hong Kong is, or at least has been, in a highly unusual situation created by its unique political constraints. But in answer to your question, under laissez-faire capitalism (of which Hong Kong is arguably the world's leading example), the rich get richer, and the poor get richer too. Capitalism is not a zero sum game. I'd question whether or not the poor in Hong Kong have truly gotten poorer, unless your time horizon is two years or less and you are looking at the effects of financial crisis from which East Asia is still recovering. But if the poor are becoming poorer, the answer is to create an opportunity society, which, among other things, requires that people are free to keep the products of their labors, or even of their good luck. Property rights must be respected. A question I might ask you: are the children of the poor in Hong Kong also destined to a life of poverty? You probably need a 50 year historical time frame to answer that question. A friend of mine from the former Soviet Union once confided that one of the things she most admired about the USA was that someone born into a poor family was able to rise to a position of eminence and success, as long as he or she had the right personal qualities. This was in stark contrast to her native land. A topic that I think would make an interesting Ph.D. dissertation would be, what is the social effect of enormously wealthy people who have earned their money through capitalist enterprise. So I'm talking about the likes of Bill Gates and J.D. Rockefeller, not about the Emir of Kuwait and the Sultan of Brunei, who only use their political power to steal from the capitalist producers. I suspect the answer would be that in general they enrich others, not impoverish them. I think Hong Kong has, at least for the past 50 years, been a difficult place in which to live, unless you are wealthy. But bear in mind that at least during the harsher years of the Communist dictatorship in China, tens of thousands of people risked their lives to escape the Socialist Paradise for the rigors of Hong Kong. One of the worst things for Hong Kong would be for the government to decide it should redistribute the wealth of the society. It may sound like a hard answer, but in general government should make no effort to cure the problem of a disparity in wealth. Regards, Larry