To: Guy E. Fleming who wrote (1442 ) 3/4/2000 1:05:00 PM From: Spytrdr Respond to of 3070
oh, is that the reason why it didnt't rise another 10% on friday, as usual. i was worried, what's going on??? i said. why didn't it gap up at least 50-points on the Blodget news? but don't worry, as we approach the split date, it will make another attempt to reach $ 300, the raving masses just looove round numbers. you all still have time to get out before the rug is pulled from under you... it did the trick with YHOO -> $ 500, wow, magic number, i shorted at $ 498 and kept thinking as i watched my prey on level II about the poor -sshole who paid EXACTLY $ 500, what was he thinking about?? $ 125 BILLION. will it be worth that one day? maybe, in the case of YHOO, but not this fast. QCOM was another textbook case, peaked at the round number $ 200 (800 pre-split), that's where i shorted it. i had shorted QCOM before, at the round number $ 400 before split, when it quickly fell to $ 329, and covered. ICGE? another one unable to cross the round number $ 200 after a ridiculous parabolic move that gave it a valuation equal to American Express, with this kind of financial profile...moneycentral.msn.com CMRC was a rare case, it made another fast $ 30 points in 10 seconds after the round number $ 300 (probably a squeeze), and then fell like a giant turd. ASKJ, another one, close to $ 200, couldn't make it. and ETYS? oh ETYS ETYS!! ha ha ha, those guys at Goldman Sachs are truly THIEVES and CROOKS, $ 80 price target, like $ 15 Billion dollars for a company selling pokemon and plush dolls over the web (but even at $ 15 billion it was a value play compared to Infospace). take a look at all those beautiful shooting stars:siliconinvestor.com siliconinvestor.com siliconinvestor.com siliconinvestor.com siliconinvestor.com siliconinvestor.com ___ "INSP is doing just fine despite some confusion yesterday about the announcement of the dates involved"