SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Anthony@Pacific who wrote (52467)3/5/2000 9:49:00 AM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
LOCK<----another one??

BUS NOTICE OF PENDENCY OF CLASS ACTION AGAINST SAF T LOK INC. AND
Jul 27 1998 11:41
Others

Business Editors/Legal Writers

NEW YORK--(BUSINESS WIRE)--July 27, 1998--Wolf Haldenstein Adler
Freeman & Herz LLP filed a class action lawsuit on July 24, 1998 in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida
on behalf of purchasers of the common stock of Saf T Lok Inc. (NASDAQ:
LOCK)("Saf T Lok" or the "Company") during the period May 26, 1998
through June 11, 1998 (the "Class Period") and were damaged thereby.
If you wish to discuss this action please contact Wolf
Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP (Michael Miske or Neil L. Zola
Esq.) at 800/575-0735 or Goodkind Labaton Rudoff & Sucharow LLP (Emily
C. Komlossy Esq.) at 954/630-1000.
The complaint charges Saf T Lok and certain officers and
directors of the Company during the Class Period with violations of
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for
misrepresenting material information concerning Saf T Lok's financial
condition, including the efficacy of a product development agreement
announced on May 26, 1998 with Semiconductor Laser International Corp. ("SLIC") to produce a laser enhanced fingerprint recognition gun
locking mechanism (the "SLIC Development Agreement").
Because of the issuance of a series of false and misleading
statements and omissions concerning Saf T Lok's business and true
financial condition, Saf T Lok's common stock was artificially
inflated during the Class period.
Plaintiff alleges in his Complaint that defendants knew the
statements regarding the SLIC Development Agreement to be false when
they were made and that the agreement with SLIC could not be followed
through on. Plaintiff alleges that SLIC had no experience with
fingerprint recognition and did not have the capability to actually
carry out the proposed development of this technology.
Plaintiff further alleges that, as defendant Franklin W. Brooks
would later tell the public, defendant John L. Gardner ("Gardner") was
never authorized to enter into the agreement in the first place.
On June 11, 1998 the Company stunned the investment community by
announcing that it had terminated the Company's President and CEO,
defendant Gardner's employment immediately and had canceled the SLIC
Development Agreement.
On the release of this devastating news of the sudden about-face
regarding the SLIC Development Agreement, the Company's stock, which
was as high as $5 1/16 on June 10, 1998, fell to as low as $2 1/4 per
share by June 12, 1998. The stock continues to trade in the $2 to $3
range.
Plaintiff seeks to recover damages on behalf of class members and
is represented by the law firm of Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman &
Herz LLP and the law firm of Goodkind Labaton Rudoff & Sucharow LLP.
The Wolf Haldenstein firm has a full service commercial practice
consisting of more than 35 attorneys based in New York City and San
Diego.
The firm's litigation department has been recognized by courts
throughout the country as highly experienced and skilled in complex
litigation, particularly with respect to federal securities laws,
class actions and shareholder litigation.
The firm's qualifications have repeatedly received very favorable
judicial recognition. Additionally, the firm has achieved recoveries
of over one billion dollars for defrauded investors and shareholders.
If you are a member of the class described above, you may, not
later than sixty days from today, move the court to serve as lead
plaintiff of the class, if you so choose. In order to serve as lead
plaintiff, however, you must meet certain legal requirements.
If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions
concerning this notice or your rights or interests with respect to
these matters, please contact Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz
LLP at 270 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10016, by telephone at
800/575-0735 (Michael Miske or Neil L. Zola Esq.) or via e-mail at classmember@whafh.com or Goodkind Labaton Rudoff & Sucharow LLP at
International Building, Suite 813, 2455 East Sunrise Boulevard, Ft.
Lauderdale, Fla. 33304 and by telephone at 954/630-1000 (Emily C.
Komlossy Esq.)
All e-mail correspondence should make reference to Saf T Lok.

--30--kmk/ph*

CONTACT: Wolf Haldenstein Adler Freeman & Herz LLP
Michael Miske or Neil L. Zola Esq.
800/575-0735 e-mail: classmember@whafh.com
or