SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WAVX Anyone? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Marty Lee who wrote (9925)3/5/2000 10:35:00 PM
From: ecommerceman  Respond to of 11417
 
ragingbull.com

By: SPIN
Reply To: None Sunday, 5 Mar 2000 at 7:47 PM EST
Post # of 152122
Mondex: 'Banks Not Critical For Success'
Smart Card Central
Dec 17 1999 : Mondex CEO, Michael Keegan, has acknowledged eCash to be "a very tough business case for banks" in necessitating a new infrastructure, a process capable of "defeating the economics of issuance". As a result, he concludes the market to be consumer- and service provider-driven, not bank-driven. Mondex is accordingly pushing its business case through card readers within PCs, set-top boxes and cell phones. The firm is similarly betting on retail implementations such as the Norwegian lottery system.

Keegan seems to say that banks have moved w/feet of clay & have been reluctant to embrace new tech because of cost/benefit concerns. as such, they have chosen an "end around" by going through CONTENT via pcs, etc. lottery? norwegian? isn't KISS a player in Scandanavia? Imagine the popularity of a lottery smart card in the US, w/kiosks?!?

Despite having 2 million chip-enabled cards in circulation, as opposed to Visa's 23 million, Mondex is admired for its industry track record. Keegan is still encouraging banks to admit failure in pushing the concept to the retail market. For example, a non-banking entity, Wave Systems, is participating in Cyber-COMM, a new Internet transaction system in France involving the use of SET and smart card readers.

Mondex is a comer. Visa remains king. Keegan is using rhetoric to add to public demand for card technologies and point out to banking that the infrastructure would be a capital investment worth making. he used WAVE as an example of forward-looking "early adopters" as an indication that the time has come to embrace such technology calling it an Internet transaction system (nice & succinct ;-)

In Keegan's view, the future of Mondex resides in the provision of e-cash through service providers, a necessary tangent to attract widespread support from banks. Going forward, Keegan is confident that the market is sufficiently large to accommodate both CEPS and Mondex products. Rather than having to reissue hunderds of millions of smart cards before 2002, as issuers of CEPS cards will have to do, Mondex is looking to its card-to-card functions for a unique selling point.

Mondex is maximizing its effort w/various services (IMO CONTENT) to get a significant enough share to justify eventual UBIQUITY. Keegan says the market is wide open. as to CEPS & card-to-card functions, i'll pass. Chooch? BigTim? DWG?

Related Links
French e-Purse Pilots Threaten Mondex
Will MULTOS Split From Mondex?
Major Banks in Mexico License Mondex

________________________

all IMO, of course.

SPIN



To: Marty Lee who wrote (9925)3/6/2000 12:06:00 AM
From: ecommerceman  Respond to of 11417
 
Interesting article on Gilder in today's Washington Post...

Market Guru Put Acolytes On Wild Ride
By Fred Barbash

Sunday, March 5, 2000; Page H01

Have you heard of the Gilder Effect?
It's a form of momentum madness that overcomes a stock after it's endorsed in the Gilder Technology Report. Published by techno-visionary George Gilder, the newsletter influences some investors so much that they jam up its Web site to get it early each month and then race to buy whatever company Gilder extols.
The result is instant run-up--20, 40, 50 or 60 percent. No analyst I'm aware of can match the Gilder Effect.
The report itself is good. He's a predictor--with an excellent track record--of technological ascendance and decline. I've subscribed to his newsletter for some months.
But I'd never fully experienced a Gilder Moment until Feb. 17, when I took an unusual step and joined the throng myself to better understand and be able to write about this strange phenomenon of a phenomenal stock market.
Before describing the experience, I hereby stress that I do not normally live this dangerously and am generally restricted, as a Washington Post financial columnist, in the kind of trading I do. I do not endorse what I did. Don't do it.
The Gilder Technology Report, $295 per year, is distributed mid-month, online and then by mail. I had been briefed by a veteran Gilderite about my mission:
* Get to his newsletter on the Internet.
* See if Gilder has added a new stock to his list.
* Buy fast.
The idea is to do it before the snail-mail subscribers know what hit them.
Gilder facilitates this by sending out an e-mail the day before publication announcing that it will be available to password-equipped subscribers by late morning. A second e-mail arrives the next day.
I got mine at precisely 11:57 a.m. on Feb. 17, informing me that the report would be accessible around noon. I went on Red Alert. I loaded one computer screen with www.gildertech.com and pointed another to my online broker.
Noon arrived. I clicked and got on the site. But there was nothing new there. Five minutes went by. I refreshed. Still nothing new. Refresh. Nothing. Refresh. Nothing.
On about the fifth try, I could no longer access the site. It was jammed. The rush had begun.
After three dozen or so more clicks to refresh, I had the newsletter and George Gilder's latest article. There was a new company there:
Xcelera.com Inc. I'd never heard of it.
I hastened to his lead article--"The Post Diluvian Paradigm"--to get some idea what the company did. The article was about an Xcelera subsidiary, Mirror Image, and claimed that it had developed a "superior" technology for Internet content distribution. That's the business of companies such as Akamai and Digital Island. They accelerate Web pages to end users so as to avoid bottlenecks like the one I had just encountered.
It's big. Over to E-Trade I went.
Xcelera--ticker symbol XLA--was selling for $129 a share. As a curious colleague sitting next to me looked on in horror, I placed an order for 100 shares at whatever price I could get.
I waited. No confirmation. Nothing happened.
I rushed over to the Bloomberg terminal in our office, called up XLA's quote and learned that the American Stock Exchange had temporarily halted trading in the issue because of a trading imbalance--which generally means, in a situation like this, that demand has overtaken supply.
The rush had become a crush.
I knew trading would soon resume--it always does--but at what price? I was shaken, thanks in no small measure to my frantic colleague, who was moaning at my side: "What are you doing? Oh, my goodness. What is this going to cost you? What have you done?"
"I have no idea," I said.
"What does the company do?" she asked.
"I have no idea," said I.
Just then, the logjam broke. I was notified that my trade was executed--hideously--at $200 a share. That was 61 points higher than when I ordered. And I was one of the lucky ones. XLA had peaked at 215.
George Gilder is a well-known supply-side economist, author and technology futurist who began publishing his newsletter in 1996. He notes in his "special report," called "Grow Rich on the Coming Technology Revolution," that he predicted early that PCs would displace mainframes and that the CDMA wireless protocol would emerge ascendant over competitors.
Last year, his focus on what he calls "The Telecosm"--bandwidth, data storage and fiber optics--produced a market return, by his calculations, of 268 percent, with Qualcomm (QCOM) and JDS Uniphase (JDSU) leading the pack.
How much Gilder personally profits from the stocks, I don't know. The newsletter notes that he and his staff "may hold positions in some or all stocks listed" in the newsletter.
Early on--pre-diluvian, I suppose--Gilder's stock picks tended to appreciate gradually. You could read the newsletter at your leisure and then take some time for independent research.
But as word of his influence has circulated--by word of mouth, on the Web and in the financial press--his choices have rocketed upward within an hour of his report's appearance online.
Last July, NorthEast Optic Network (NOPT) gained 67 percent on Gilder's recommendation. In December, the lucky company was Globalstar, which doubled. Terayon (TERN) takes flight every time Gilder mentions it, which is often. All are roughly in the same business--moving data quickly, Gilder's special focus.
Xcelera closed Feb. 16 at $129, on volume of 79,900 shares. On Gilder Day, it closed at $190, on volume of 928,300 shares. On the 18th it hit $240; on the 22nd, $270. It closed Friday at $325.
I got out at $240. I'd had enough. My experiment was complete.
Such leaps are not uncommon these days. But what is Xcelera anyway? In the last report it filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, for the fiscal year ended Jan. 31, 1999, it reported earnings of about $3 million. That wasn't from its technology, though. The earnings came from real estate activities.
The SEC report said Digital Mirror--which created all the market excitement--was a start-up that "did not have significant revenue."
After the mid-February burst of buying, Xcelera's president, Alexander Vik, appeared on CNBC, where he was questioned about the company's number of U.S. customers. "I don't know the exact number in the U.S.," he said. "We have about 50 networks running traffic on our network."
When I talked with Vik last week, he said most of his customers were in Europe, though the company has built five access points--for storage of Web content--in the United States.
I don't doubt that it's a respectable company with potential. I talked with competitors last week and they don't doubt it, either, though they and others took issue with Gilder's claim that Xcelera's technology was dramatically better than theirs.
But consider this: The stock price of Xcelera has appreciated roughly 50,000 percent in the past year. I kid you not. Adjusted for splits, it's gone from 66 cents to $325. It ran up before Gilder got to it, thanks in part to articles by one of the kings of momentum trading, Jon D. Markman of Moneycentral.com, who suggested on two occasions that it could be a "potential 10,000 percent gainer."
So it's already a 500 bagger. That's more growth than Dell Computer experienced in the past 15 years, more than Yahoo since its founding. The growth rate of XLA's stock price in a year is Microsoft's over 15 years.
Does this make any sense at all? Of course not--and I'm a tolerant man when it comes to stock valuations.
What do I conclude? I don't like it, either as a participant or as an observer. It distorts reality. It wildly exaggerates value. It makes stock choice more dangerous.
Gilder, of course, is not responsible for the buying habits of his readers. But his report does encourage the frenzy in its Web site pitch: "Be the first to know which companies are on the right track. . . . Profit from the biggest investment opportunity of all time. . . . Discover the companies that will play leading roles in the bandwidth revolution and watch their stock prices soar."
I do also wonder about his hype about how we can "Grow Rich on the Coming Technology Revolution." And I do wonder why he says nothing in his report about the previous run-up of Xcelera--from 66 cents to $129, over the year. The Wall Street Journal asked him a similar question recently. He responded: "That's not my job. I don't do price."
There was a contradiction in Gilder's description of Xcelera as well. First he said Mirror Image has 32 content-access sites around the world. Then, three paragraphs later, he said that Vik plans to spin off Digital Mirror from Xcelera "in an IPO that can finance the creation of the full thirty-two" sites.
I tried to talk to Gilder last week, but his assistant said he wouldn't be available until April, if then.
It seems to me that now that he knows what's going on, he ought to at least alert his readers to some fundamentals.
What began as a voyage of intellectual discovery for the Gilder Report has become momentum madness for those who trade off it. It is clearly possible to profit in the short run--as I did, to the pretax tune of $3,964--and perhaps also in the long run.
But tread cautiously when considering stocks that have been mobbed--or Gilderized. That's what I learned.
Fred Barbash can be contacted at barbashf@washpost.com.



To: Marty Lee who wrote (9925)3/6/2000 7:22:00 AM
From: ecommerceman  Respond to of 11417
 
Buying online: May we have your fingerprint?

By Anne Chen, PC Week

In any given James Bond movie, 007 will be subject to an iris scan, a hand print scan or voice analysis by technology that secures and verifies his identity. All the cool gadgets, fictional or not, make for great entertainment.
For many companies engaging in e-business, however, avant-garde technology that can positively identify individuals would be a lot more than a few laughs. It could be a way to thwart online crime.

ÿ? Unmasking electronic visitors
? Hacker startup joins e-security market
? DVD security hacked?

Just as shoppers are concerned with the legitimacy of sites, e-businesses are concerned with the legitimacy of their customers. As a result, an increasing number of companies are investing in biometric technology as a way to protect both sides.
Companies such as Drug Emporium Inc. (Nasdaq:DEMP - news); ING Direct Canada, a division of ING Group; and Election.com Inc. have begun testing fingerprint scans, among other things, to verify users' identities when prescribing drugs, accessing bank accounts and voting online.
Biometric technology, which digitally encodes physical attributes of the voice, eye, face or hand and associates the ID with biological attributes stored in a file, are commonly used in organizations such as the FBI to allow clearance into a building, for instance. But today, using the technology to secure online transactions is rare. It can be expensive to outfit every customer with a biometric scanner, and it is difficult to convince consumers to supply something as personal and distinguishing as a fingerprint.
But many companies, especially in the financial and health care industries, will deploy biometrics anyway. That's because user authentication is the weakest link in e-commerce, and biometrics could not only solve that problem, it could eliminate online fraud, say analysts. "Biometrics is a foolproof, physical way of authenticating who somebody is in a way much better than passwords, which are easily forgotten or stolen," said Bob Geiger, president of info-defense.com Inc., a security consultancy in Ardsley, N.Y.

Technology trend

To meet the expected demand for biometric equipment and applications, Infineon Technologies AG and Veridicom Inc. have announced plans to ramp up production on their finger-scanning chips that can be embedded into a computer keyboard or mouse. And earlier this month, Keyware Technologies Inc. and Proton World International demonstrated at the Smart Card conference in London an e-commerce smart card that can verify its owner through fingerprint verification or iris recognition. The smart card will release credit card and user information to a Web site only after an identification has been made.
With this kind of progress, the corporate biometrics market, now a paltry $67 million a year, is estimated to grow to $670 million by 2004 as the technology becomes cheaper and more reliable, said Samir Nanavati, a partner in the New York consultancy International Biometric Group LLC (see graphic, right).
And once companies start deploying the available technology and proving its validity, consumers will likely feel more comfortable using it, experts predict.
One company leading the effort is ING Direct Canada, a division of ING Group in Toronto, which will roll out fingerprint biometric security systems to its customers next month. Jointly developed with SecuGen Corp. and Saflink Corp., the system will identify online banking customers by their fingerprint on a computer mouse. ING Direct Canada will deliver the mice to a select group of its banking customers, giving them the option to secure their transactions over the Internet.
Similarly, Charles Schwab & Co. Inc., in San Francisco, is piloting voice recognition technology that will allow the company to authenticate users of its phone banking option with technology from Nuance Communications Inc. While no plans have been made to add biometric technology to the company's trading Web site, a spokesman for the company said Schwab has not ruled it out as a way to protect its online customers.
Outside the financial industry, biometrics as an e-business authentication tool is being pushed into the limelight by lawmakers. In California and Ohio, state legislators are requiring that physicians who want to prescribe drugs online must be authenticated using biometrics.
To meet the demands of new laws, DrugEmporium.com, the e-commerce arm of Drug Emporium, began exploring the use of biometric technologies last February. In November, the company, based in Columbus, Ohio, rolled out various biometric hardware units to 5,000 hospitals and physicians in Ohio. This year, the company will add 5,000 biometric pilot projects in California, said Matthew Erick, director of pharmacy operations at DrugEmporium.com.
"Pharmaceuticals is an extremely private and secure area, and people want to be confident that their information is not going out to never-never land," Erick said. "Biometrics enables us to take security a step further in an efficient and easy-to-use manner."
Using software and services from BioNetrix Systems Corp., in Vienna, Va., the company is testing an application that allows physicians to order prescriptions over the Internet with whatever method of biometric identification the doctor prefers.
DrugEmporium.com is footing the bill for all of the doctors' equipment and sending BioNetrix consultants on-site to each physician's location to install the hardware and conduct the initial biometric scan. Then, BioNetrix's Authentication Suite will manage all authentication processes, including passwords, tokens, fingerprints, retinal scans and voice recognition, from one console through its Authentication Management Infrastructure. All data is encrypted with 40-bit and higher Secure Sockets Layer encryption.
"The system allows us to identify that the prescription was received by a licensed pharmacy and that the doctor is who he says he is," Erick said.
Depending on the success of the pilots, Erick said, by June, DrugEmporium.com might enable its Web site to accept biometric authentication from all shoppers, not just physicians and pharmacists. The company will vary the level of authentication required, depending on what types of purchases shoppers are making.

Invasion of privacy

Getting customers involved is a step in the right direction. For organizations to achieve their dual goals of using biometrics to increase security while minimizing user inconvenience, they will have to overcome customers' fear of privacy invasion. "One factor restraining the growth of biometrics is the public's view of biometrics as intrusive. If you have trust issues with a business, you can change your password or make up a user name. You can't change your fingerprint," said Nanavati of IBG.
To help people become familiar with the technology, Joe Mohen, CEO at Election.com, in Garden City, N.Y., offers hand and fingerprint identification as options for authenticating voters in online elections. Unfortunately, no organization yet has opted to use the technology in their online elections because many think it would make their voters uncomfortable.
"We see opportunity in biometrics but, for now, only in certain situations," Mohen said.
Mohen, whose company will conduct the Arizona state Democratic party primary online, said he sees the usefulness of installing biometric hardware at physical polling places to identify voters. But when it comes to using the technology for at-home online voting, he said a high level of consumer acceptance will need to be achieved first.
And more corporations will have to get on board with the technology to pave the way. However, many companies are not ready to take on the task because it could strain the IT department.
At Equifax Secure, a division of Equifax Inc. (NYSE:EFX - news), General Manager Jeff Johnson physically secures his data centers with biometric palm readers. But when it comes to authenticating e-commerce users, Johnson said Equifax is not interested in building and securing databases full of fingerprints.
"We believe that for certain applications biometrics does make a lot of sense," said Johnson, in Atlanta?for example, "as a way to release a digital certificate that will grant access to private information like credit reports."
Digital certificates are manageable, but having to control the biometric authentication from the corporate side is a huge undertaking. So, for now, Equifax has no plans to begin collecting the fingerprints of the millions of consumers it compiles data on, Johnson said.
Still, when it comes to James Bond-type technologies, he admitted, "Never say never."

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unmasking electronic visitors

Which biometric security technology is right for your application? IT managers evaluating biometric security measures should consider their organization's needs and how users will react to the technology. Analysts recommend testing the systems under realistic conditions before committing to a particular hardware. Here are some of the options:
TECHNOLOGY HOW IT WORKS CLIENT HARDWARE NEEDED
Fingerprint or palm print Finger scan technology is based on the fact that fingerprints have unique characteristics. Verification systems capture the flat image of a finger and perform one-to-one verification. Scanner
Hand and finger geometry The system takes a picture of the hand and examines 90 characteristics, including the three-dimensional shape of the hand, length and width of fingers, and shape of knuckles. Reader hardware
Voice recognition The user states a given pass phrase and the system creates a template based on characteristics including: cadence, pitch, tone, and shape of larynx. Background noises and voice changes can affect accuracy. PC microphone or telephone handset
Iris and retina recognition A camera captures an image of the eye's iris. Accuracy is high since every individual has unique iris patterns. Camera
Dynamic signature verification The user signs his/her signature on a digitized graphics tablet. Signature dynamics, such as speed, relative speed, stroke order, stroke count and pressure are analyzed. The system compares what the signature looks like with how it is signed. Pad and stylus
Face recognition A camera is used to acquire an image of a face from a few feet away. The system then analyzes the geometry of the face such as the distance between the eyes and the nose.