SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Tony Viola who wrote (100363)3/6/2000 11:07:00 AM
From: Road Walker  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Tony, RE: Sanders

I posted this on the AMD thread:

<I though Jerry did a good job on CNBC. The one thing that is unusual is that he continues calling Intel a monopolist, and in the next sentence says AMD has a 17% marketshare, and growing. Can't have it both ways. A thinking listener might say "this guy is BS". It's time he got off the David vs. Goliath thing.>

More important, I am disappointed with Intel. They knew upfront that the release of a 1 Gig chip was going to be a public relations coup, and they got aced. When Intel makes it's announcements on Wednesday, it's going to sound like "me too", a position we are used to seeing AMD in.

I'm excited about Intel's future prospects, disappointed that it appears that they have let their core business slip.

John



To: Tony Viola who wrote (100363)3/6/2000 11:27:00 AM
From: brushwud  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Does he [Jerry Sanders] steal everything from Intel (Moore's Law?).

If he stole Moore's Law, he stole it from Fairchild Semiconductor, where he & Moore both worked in the 60s before Intel & AMD were founded. Gordon Moore expostulated his Law around 1964.