SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Canadian Investment Resource Guide -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gofer who wrote (518)3/6/2000 9:46:00 PM
From: TFF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 591
 
Regulators to relax rules for e-trading 'Suitability rule': Investors could trade without broker notification

Katherine Macklem
Financial Post

Canada's securities regulators are ready to allow investors to make trades electronically without being vetted by their brokers -- a move long called for by the country's discount brokers and one that may help ease the backlog in discount brokerage trading.

However, it may still be a few months before the rules are relaxed, Frank Switzer, spokesman for the Ontario Securities Commission, said yesterday.

The Canadian Securities Administrators, the umbrella organization for the 13 provincial and territorial securities regulators, decided yesterday in a conference call to take an important step towards dropping the so-called suitability rule for investors making trades when there is no advice given and when the business hasn't been solicited by a broker.

The suitability rule, which has been in place for decades and was designed to protect investors, requires brokers to ensure that the trades ordered by clients match their investment profiles.

However, with the advent of electronic trading, the rule has been called obsolete, at least for the class of investors who buy and sell securities directly online or by telephone.

"It's getting the ball rolling," said Mr. Switzer of the OSC, the largest and most powerful of the CSA members. The OSC has already signalled that the rules should be relaxed for investors who trade directly without advice.

The CSA decided yesterday to publish a concept proposal on the issue, which will call for comments from industry players, before the rules are officially changed.

"We had hoped they would come out with a rule because of the urgency of the matter," said Joseph Oliver, president and chief executive of the Investment Dealers Association. "The suitability rule impacts on the speed of execution and to some extent on the cost. To be competitive with the U.S. market, which doesn't have the suitability rule for unsolicited trades, the issue has to be dealt with."

The IDA, which regulates investment dealers, is considering shortening the required training period from 90 days to 30 days for discount brokerage employees who process trades.

The fully registered investment advisors would continue to have the 90-day training requirement.

"This is a matter of real urgency because it would permit the discount brokers to hire employees more quickly and be better able to cope with the order flow," Mr. Oliver said. "It's not only an issue for today, but in the event there is a market correction, this could be critical."

Many discount brokers have said it would be easier to ease the massive trading backlog of recent weeks if trainees could process trades after a shorter training program.

Paul Bates, president and chief executive of Charles Schwab Canada, said dropping the suitability rule for online traders would result in better efficiency and could lead to better prices for clients.

The securities regulators would require the self-traded accounts be provided within a separate business from any investment accounts where an investor receives advice from a broker, Mr. Switzer said.

Mr. Bates called this measure "completely counterproductive."

"The one piece that I'm troubled by is that you'd have to have a separate legal entity" for accounts where the suitability rule does not apply, Mr. Bates said.

"It does not look at the solution to the issue through the eyes of the client."



To: Gofer who wrote (518)3/11/2000 8:09:00 AM
From: TFF  Respond to of 591
 
Overheard:Waterhouse Gripes Reach Crescendo on Online Boards
By STACY FORSTER and CARRIE LEE
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL INTERACTIVE EDITION

It's not unusual for investors to gripe on Internet message boards about unsatisfactory service from their online brokers, but this week the complaints against TD Waterhouse Group appeared to hit a crescendo.

The flak from unhappy customers was so intense that a Waterhouse message board on Silicon Investor (www.silconinvestor.com), one of the busiest stock-chat sites, was among the hottest on Tuesday

What was all the screaming about? All the usual service issues that have plagued the online industry: problems executing trades, long waits on hold to speak to someone on the telephone, and unhelpful customer service representatives.

Officials at Waterhouse, the online brokerage arm of Canada's Toronto-Dominion Bank, admit that some customers did have problems making trades on Tuesday and that its Web site was shut down for half an hour.

John Chapel, an executive vice president at the New York firm, says heavy traffic at the Web site can cause problems with online services. "There are times we don't do so well, it's challenging," he says.

Complaints against online brokers usually rise during times of extreme market volatility when trading surges and companies' systems and staff become swamped. To some extent, that may have been the case this week when blue-chip stocks tanked and trading volumes soared.

Want to receive an e-mail alert when Heard on the Net columns are published? See the E-Mail Setup page for details on how to subscribe.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average skidded nearly 400 points on Tuesday, fueling the second-heaviest trading day on the New York Stock Exchange. Computers and telephone systems at brokerage firms can become taxed during such times as nervous investors dump stocks and seek help.

"The increase in trading results in an increase in phone calls, it puts more pressure on customer service teams," says Dan Burke, an analyst at Gomez Advisors in Lincoln, Mass., which tracks the online trading business.

Even without the market volatility, service issues at Waterhouse have been building. The company slipped one notch to 11 in Gomez' winter rankings. "TD Waterhouse struggled to provide timely customer service" and "performed poorly in e-mail and customer service inquiries," Gomez said.

Keynote Systems, a San Mateo, Calif., company that measures Web site performance, says Waterhouse's site has lagged other online brokers' sites recently. On average, customers at Waterhouse had a 52% success rate performing their transactions compared with an industry average of 81%, says Dan Todd, a spokesman for Keynote.

While service disappointments have roiled its customers, Waterhouse isn't without company. Other online brokers also face constant jabbing, including some during this week's market havoc. Moreover, several brokers have been plagued in the past by embarrassing computer outages.

In the face of high-profile embarrassments and investigations by regulators, many online brokers have stepped up efforts to improve service, especially the capacity of their computer and telephone systems. Indeed, the industry has withstood volatile periods recently much better than it has in the past.

Mr. Chapel, of Waterhouse, declined to disclose the company's expenditures on customer service and systems improvements. But he says the company is aggressively hiring more service representatives and making various technical enhancements to its Web site.

But that's no comfort to Waterhouse customers, who were stymied this week when they made stock trades or tried to get help from the company over the telephone. Some worried that the problems may have caused them to lose money.

Tom Phillips, of Atlanta, says he was waiting to see whether the company would compensate him for any losses that result from a trade that wasn't executed on Tuesday when he placed an order to sell more than 500 shares of Creative BioMolecules. Mr. Phillips says an apparent computer problem at the Waterhouse site had left him unable to confirm his order on Tuesday.

He says the site provided him with an automated notification that his order was being processed, but never gave him a confirmation that the trade actually went through -- even after several attempts. The order apparently failed. He says the stock had fallen about $3 from the price at which he had intended to sell it, meaning he would lose more than $1,500 on the trade.

"There's been such volatility on a few stocks that I own that it's clear you can make a little money intraday," he says. "It's very difficult ... to buy back a stock you think you've sold an hour ago if you can't be confident it's sold. Flying blind is what it feels like."

Mr. Phillips, who also voiced his displeasure on Silicon Investor, says he also had problems reaching a customer service representative via telephone to confirm his order, and also on Wednesday to help resolve the problem. He says he spent 35 minutes on hold for a customer service representative.

Online investors were venting on other boards, too. "Down again this morning!" wrote one participant on a Yahoo! Finance board for Waterhouse (quote.yahoo.com) on Tuesday. "I can't even trade and you can forget about reaching them by phone."

"Yesterday morning I placed a sell order ... and the order has just sat there with no fill. Yesterday I tried to call three times and gave up after being disconnected twice and being on hold for over an hour last time," wrote another.

Waterhouse spent $36.1 million in advertising and marketing in the last three months of 1999 to lure new clients, the most it has ever spent in one quarter. The company signed up 260,500 new accounts, excluding the effects of attrition or acquisitions. At the end of the quarter, Waterhouse had about 3.3 million total accounts.

Waterhouse registered 136,900 trades per day during the last quarter of 1999, up from 56,900 a year ago and from 70,000 in the previous quarter.