Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Minera Andes, MAI on Alberta -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Bishop who wrote (244)	3/7/2000 1:08:00 AM
From: Fred C. Dobbs	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 340

Hi Jim, I hope good. If I have learned anything in the last two years it sure wasn't geology. But I started putting to practise what I've learned and I like the story. Did my DD. Reporting, low o/s, own the land, results seem good compared to others companies, if it's shallow enough to be mined open pit, return will be good, even at low POG. Dilution on the PP shouldn't matter too much with the low o/s and who can't use the money for operations anyways? Waited for the pull back, thanks for the rule, they always do, bought in when it found it's support in the low .30s and again today after the news expecting a small gap in the morning. Market depth looks good. cdnx.ca I know you like your charts and these seem like they're screeming to do something. Oversold and the stochastic is turning up. askresearch.com Last time I compared gold companies, Barrick, Placer, and Newmount ran @$17 per share when MCap's and O/S's were averaged. Figure thes guys should be worth a few nickels. Geeze I almost had myself convinced I knew what I was talking about. Probably got it reversed. Any thoughts Ron