SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (7103)3/7/2000 1:35:00 AM
From: Victor Lazlo  Respond to of 10293
 
Nor for delivering any accountability.
Victor



To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (7103)3/7/2000 2:16:00 AM
From: DanZ  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
I predict that GUMM's slow steady decline, as you put it, will come to an abrupt halt one day with a significantly higher gap opening on news that two clinical studies have been published (therapeutic and prophylactic). It is also possible that a third study on allergy relief will also be published. Please note the difference between will be published and have been published. I don't know the precise date, but I believe that it will happen relatively soon. I have already explained my rationale for this speculation and I don't care if you or anyone else believes me. I haven't been wrong about GUMM for over a year and I don't think that I will be wrong this time. Go ahead and gamble. My honest opinion is that anyone who is short that day will lose and lose big.

I also predict that Wexler will be back. It doesn't make much sense that he has been posting multiple times daily on Yahoo ever since he "left" SI. Did he get suspended? I guess we'll find out in a few days when he returns here to dish out more of his BS.



To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (7103)3/7/2000 4:18:00 PM
From: Hank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
"I've got this image of Mike wearing his Taco Bell hat..."

I think you're giving Mikey more credit than he deserves. Mikey doesn't have the people skills required to wait on customers. It's more likely Taco Bell would hire him as a night janitor where you'd find him picking his nose and mumbling to himself as he cleaned the toilets.



To: Mark Marcellus who wrote (7103)3/7/2000 8:58:00 PM
From: Mike M  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Mark, I cannot for the life of me see that you have any insight on "witty retorts"....There is no precedence.

Glad that you are amused by the Taco Bell image. Schmandel's education level and social development must equate to yours. What a sad set of circumstances.

Frankly, this thread never had much value. It deteriorated in rapid fashion just like Wexler's first one....