Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JMD who wrote (7446)	3/8/2000 6:21:00 PM
From: Rob C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10852

Anyone else showing a close at 13 1/2? On the PACX I show 1000 at 13 1/2. I guess that means the stock will open down a buck tomorrow. Regards, Rob

To: JMD who wrote (7446)	3/8/2000 8:26:00 PM
From: gdichaz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10852

Surfer: For old times sake. You and I have been at this for a bit, no? A couple of points hit me as a long, long, long time long. The cc. was arranged by LBros to correct the absolute, total and misinformation (polite term) "hatchet job" (not so polite) of ML - among the Iridium sponsors and die hard witnesses to death. The play within the play was the most interesting of all. BS had "analysts" saying that he was being shafted by ML et al and the short sellers. Absolutely mind boggling. Never, in my long life have I heard other "analysts" imply - that is the best they can do - imply - that the ML guy was what Barrons is famous for - the agent of the shorts. Amazing. Did anyone else find the cc to be a situation which seems very very unusual - set up by LBros to disprove ML. If so, why was ML and the "analyst" on the call. What a world. Of course, what I thought I "heard" may be wrong. Perhaps the ML guy was straight, above board and doing his best for seeking the truth. Comments? Again, just my impressions, but very strong impressions. Best. (Ever hear from Readware?) Chaz