SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Joe NYC who wrote (97631)3/9/2000 1:29:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570940
 
X-box: Are they really saying late 2001? That is a very, very long time from now. The trouble with x-box, if it's just a prepackaged PC, and that's what it's sounding like, then it will have to compete with the ongoing evolution in, uh, regular PCs. Which will continue to get cheaper, and faster, and are more flexible, though of course they're a pain to upgrade too.

Cheers, Dan.



To: Joe NYC who wrote (97631)3/9/2000 2:10:00 PM
From: Pravin Kamdar  Respond to of 1570940
 
Joe,

Yes. The Microsoft endorsement should award less risk to AMD and help achieve a more than laughable PE.

Also, for the Xbox to be successful against PSII, I think MS needs to develop extensions to DirectX that offer game developers an API that has a higher level of abstraction in terms of animation and physical modeling, such as with Sony's Emotion Engine and the new ATI Charisma Engine. Something along these lines could help distinguish the Xbox from a PC and give MS something to liscense to make money of the darn thing.

Pravin



To: Joe NYC who wrote (97631)3/9/2000 2:12:00 PM
From: Pravin Kamdar  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570940
 
Joe,

Also, I do not think that MS can afford to wait until Q4, 2001 to release the Xbox. Q4, 2000 would be more like it.

Pravin.