Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Rande Is . . . HOME -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rande Is who wrote (22041)	3/9/2000 3:03:00 PM
From: Steven Finkel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

Great job Rande! Your work has certainly benefitted MANY on the thread. I just wanted to re-visit the RDOC/RDOCW issue, for a learning experience for the thread: RDOC today is up 6.5% RDOCW today is up 35.53% and continues to trade at a healthy multiple to its current "intrinsic" value. I bring it up NOT to say, hey look I was right, because that benefits NO ONE. Instead, I simply hope people recognize the unique leverage that RDOCW affords the investor, and it is my opinion that this leverage is what allows the warrant to trade ahead of itself. What do I mean? Follow this: RDOC was identified by you (Rande) some time ago and has already returned roughly 35% to those who were fortunate enough to buy the stock when you included it in the ultra aggressive port (or before). But follow my reasoning here: you (rande) don't put stocks in your ultra aggressive port so that they can return only 35% for the year. 350% tends to be more of your target. All that aside, when you couple the fact that RDOC has dramatically inreased their sales, has earnings coming out soon, has a one year rough target of 6-8 given by yourself, and clearly is attracting some momentum play, I say to myself, hmmm..... IF RDOC hits 7, then the warrant's INTRINSIC value is 7*2= 14-5.74= 8.25, which was well ahead of its price of 2 just two days ago. SO: Even though the warrant was trading "ahead" of itself, and still is, I decided that it was a healthy risk that at some point RDOC would hit 7, which would return 133% on the common, or 400% on the warrant. Again, it is the unique terms of this warrant that makes it so powerfull. I hope that some have taken advantage of this discussion over the past few days. Being fair, I will add that warrants often trade at lower volumes and have less liquidity. They often also carry larger spreads which can be frustrating.

To: Rande Is who wrote (22041)	3/9/2000 3:08:00 PM
From: Sye Walsh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 57584

Copy of a post from RB on 3/9/2000 ragingbull.com Weekly Second Opinion - AKLM 03/06/00 Symbol: AKLM Name: ACCLAIM ENTERTAINMEN Exchange: NMS PRICE ANALYSIS Wk. Close 5.94 Wk. Open 4.55 Wk. High 6.47 Wk. Low 4.50 Wk. Change 1.56 YrHigh 9.31 YrLow 3.00 Mo Chg (%) 66.9 Resistance N/A Support 5.50 SELL STOP 2.75 Volatility (%) 11 Position 84 ADXR 32 OPINION C-Rate 0.0 LONG 03/06/00 5.94 VOLUME ANALYSIS Ave Daily Vol 18599 Mo Chg (%) -2.7 * U/D 1.0 Slope UP Obv BR * Pos Obv BL Neg Obv BL MFI 84 Slope UP UPGRADED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS Alpha -0.07 Beta 0.87 MACD-ST BL MACD-LT BL 50-Day R.S. 1.18 10-Day M.A. UP 126 21-Day M.A. UP 146 50-Day M.A. UP 142 200-Day M.A. DOWN 96 STO(Slow %K) 77 STO(Fast %K) 73 Wilders-RSI 83 OBOS 1 Bollinger Bands 109 RSV 24 POWER RATING 84 SCORE = 0 COMMENT Moving Average Convergence/Divergence (MACD) indicates a BULLISH TREND Chart pattern indicates a STRONG UPWARD TREND Relative Strength is BULLISH Up/Down volume pattern indicates that the stock is under ACCUMULATION The 50 day MOVING AVERAGE is rising which is BULLISH The 200 day MOVING AVERAGE is falling which is BEARISH LOOK FOR SUPPORT AT 5.50 RECOMMENDATION STOCK IS A BUY Market Edge & Second Opinion are neither offers to sell nor solicitations of offers to buy any security. See User Agreement for other disclaimers. How come these guys and their buddies can't figure it out as fast as you Rande?