Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Gliatech (GLIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dr. John M. de Castro who wrote (1476)	3/9/2000 10:46:00 PM
From: Dr. John M. de Castro	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2001

More research on complement inhibition for bypass surgery Soluble complement receptor-1 protects heart, lung, and cardiac myofilament function from cardiopulmonary bypass damage. Circulation 2000 Feb 8;101(5):541-6 Chai PJ, Nassar R, Oakeley AE, Craig DM, Quick G Jr, Jaggers J, Sanders SP, Ungerleider RM, Anderson PA Department of Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA. BACKGROUND: Host defense system activation occurs with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and is thought to contribute to the pathophysiological consequences of CPB. Complement inhibition effects on the post-CPB syndrome were tested with soluble complement receptor-1 (sCR1). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty neonatal pigs (weight 1.8 to 2.8 kg) were randomized to control and sCR1-treated groups. LV pressure and volume, left atrial pressure, pulmonary artery pressure and flow, and respiratory system compliance and resistance were measured. Preload recruitable stroke work, isovolumic diastolic relaxation time constant (tau), and pulmonary vascular resistance were determined. Pre-CPB measures were not statistically significantly different between the 2 groups. After CPB, preload recruitable stroke work was significantly higher in the sCR1 group (n=5, 46.8+/-3.2x10(3) vs n=6, 34.3+/-3.7x10(3) erg/cm(3), P=0.042); tau was significantly lower in the sCR1 group (26.4+/-1.5, 42.4+/-6. 6 ms, P=0.003); pulmonary vascular resistance was significantly lower in the sCR1 group (5860+/-1360 vs 12 170+/-1200 dyn. s/cm(5), P=0.009); arterial PO(2) in 100% FIO(2) was significantly higher in the sCR1 group (406+/-63 vs 148+/-33 mm Hg, P=0.01); lung compliance and airway resistance did not differ significantly. The post-CPB Hill coefficient of atrial myocardium was higher in the sCR1 group (2.88+/-0.29 vs 1.88+/-0.16, P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS:sCR1 meaningfully moderates the post-CPB syndrome, supporting the hypothesis that complement activation contributes to this syndrome.

To: Dr. John M. de Castro who wrote (1476)	3/9/2000 10:51:00 PM
From: Dr. John M. de Castro	Respond to of 2001

Still more on complement inhibition for bypass Total complement inhibition: an effective strategy to limit ischemic injury during coronary revascularization on cardiopulmonary bypass. Circulation 1999 Sep 28;100(13):1438-42 Lazar HL, Bao Y, Gaudiani J, Rivers S, Marsh H Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Mass 02118, USA. BACKGROUND: Activation of complement during revascularization of ischemic myocardium accentuates myocardial dysfunction. Soluble human complement receptor type 1 (sCR1) is a potent inhibitor of complement, as are heparin-bonded (HB) cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits. This study sought to determine whether total complement inhibition with the combination of sCR1 and HB-CPB limits damage during the revascularization of ischemic myocardium. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 40 pigs, the second and third diagonal coronary arteries were occluded for 90 minutes, followed by 45 minutes of cardioplegic arrest and 180 minutes of reperfusion. In 10 pigs, sCR1 (10 mg/kg) was infused 5 minutes after the onset of coronary occlusion (sCR1), 10 received HB-CPB only (HB-CPB), 10 received sCR1 and HB-CPB (sCR1+HB), and 10 received neither sCR1 or HB-CPB (unmodified). Addition of sCR1 to the HB group resulted in less myocardial tissue acidosis (DeltapH = -0.72+/-0.03 for unmodified; -0.46+/-0.05 for HB; -0.18+/-0.04 for sCR1; -0.13+/-0.01 for sCR1+HB), better recovery of wall motion scores (4 = normal to -1 = dyskinesia; 1.67+/-0.17 for unmodified; 2.80+/-0.08 for HB; 3.35+/-0.10 for sCR1; 3.59+/-0.08 for sCR1+HB), less lung water accumulation (5.46+/-0.28% for unmodified; 2.39+/-0.34% for HB; 1.22+/-0.07% for sCR1; 1.24+/-0.13% for sCR1+HB), and smaller infarct size (area necrosis/area risk = 44.6+/-0.7% for unmodified; 33.2+/-1.9% for HB; 19.0+/-2.4% for sCR1; 20+/-1.0% for sCR1+HB) (P<0.05 versus unmodified; P<0.05 versus unmodified and HB groups). CONCLUSIONS: Total complement inhibition with sCR1 and sCR1+HB circuits optimizes recovery during the revascularization of ischemic myocardium.