Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jdaasoc who wrote (37888)	3/10/2000 12:52:00 AM
From: pompsander	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 93625

John: Did this get posted? Seems like more good news. ee.asiansources.com

To: Jdaasoc who wrote (37888)	3/10/2000 12:59:00 PM
From: George the Greek	Respond to of 93625

Jdaasoc, thanks for the pointer to the RapidIO consortium. I did not know about them. Article says Clocking in the spec is double-edged, passing data on both the rising and falling edges which would seem to put them in the same boat with Hitachi in conflict with Rambus IP. Yes? No? But the RapidIO swiched fabric seems to have more scope than (mere) Rambus memory interface tech. Interesting that they say they can implement the Rambus protocol on top of their physical layer. I will have to read their white paper. George P.S.: This hardly belongs in a postscript, but mighty pleased with the split announcement. It had been speculated here, and I thought to myself "a 4-for-1 would be appropriate". Now it is on the horizon, a bit far out, but coming (subject to shareholder approval, blah blah, woof woof).