SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Procter & Gamble (PG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: coyote who wrote (124)3/12/2000 10:32:00 PM
From: Adelantado  Respond to of 196
 
P & G is the example of why the so-called Blue Chips aren't that safe. Seems to me that it was used to define safety compare with the Qcom, MFST CSCO and the other high risers..ie risky. Not only isn't P.G an investment to keep up with inflation, but no one wants any. So now, Florida will have a recession as the many retirees who had their savings "safely" invested in P & G suffered a sudden loss of wealth and lack of spending power. The so-called investment counselors have a lot of explaining to do, as well as the lazy analysis that didn't do their homework.

Joe



To: coyote who wrote (124)3/13/2000 8:34:00 PM
From: droop3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 196
 
Durk says the lawsuits are just a nuisance and routine, no validity. As a P&Ger I can say that there was no intent to deceive. That's not P&G, and what could be gained?

Profit forecasting is completed monthly. Durk went public as soon as they understood what the February numbers meant. The earlier conversations with analyst were based on January numbers.

But you can believe there is some scrambling!


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News