SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : ECNC (OTC:BB) - eConnect -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: M Vavolizza who wrote (5993)3/11/2000 12:12:00 AM
From: Buoy12  Respond to of 18222
 
Manny,

Have your people contact your people!

What the hey are you blabbing about?

Just curious?

I am so confused?



To: M Vavolizza who wrote (5993)3/11/2000 1:26:00 AM
From: Bear Down  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18222
 
FROM THE INFORMATION DEPARTMENT

SALT LAKE CITY-- March 10, Pluvia Securities Research Initiates Coverage of eConnect, (OTC Bulletin Board: ECNC), at the current price of $14.50 with a STRONG SELL Recommendation and a target price of under $1.00
OUR STRONG SELL RECOMMENDATION AND TARGET PRICE OF $1.00 ARE BASED ON:

1. eConnect's bleak financial condition;
2. The significant number of new shares issued by eConnect that when sold may negatively impact the stock price;
3. A series of false, misleading press releases issued by eConnect regarding their business prospects and relationships;
5. eConnect's failure to file reports with the SEC disclosing significant events;
6. eConnect's enormous valuation compared to industry market leaders;

BLEAK FINANCIAL CONDITION AND INCREASE IN NEW SHARES OUTSTANDING

eConnect's 10Q filing for the company's September 30, 1999 quarter shows current assets of $44,664 and current liabilities of $1,062,446. The filing also reports only $40,000 of revenue for the entire quarter.

eConnect's 1999 2nd quarter 10Q reports 30.9 million issued and outstanding shares. The 1999 3rd quarter 10Q reports 77.9 million shares issued, and according to the company's transfer agent as of yesterday, approximately 158 million shares are now issued and outstanding. We believe the significant increase in shares outstanding could negatively impact the stock price if they are sold into the market.

FALSE MISLEADING PRESS RELEASES AND FAILURE TO FILE REQUIRED SEC DISCLOSURES

eConnect's Information Officer stated yesterday eConnect has two sources of revenue, a "Powerclick" website and a gambling operation.

EConnect's Powerclick website consists primarily of an affiliate link to Freeshop.com, which is a direct marketing company. According to Freeshop.com, anyone can join the affiliate program and earn $0.05 per "click-thru" web traffic driven to the Freeshop.com website. Freeshop's affiliate program consists of over 50,000 affiliates which operate websites similar to eConnect's Powerclick website.

In a press release issued on February 21, 2000 eConnect states, "eConnect is proud to announce that its Powerclick subsidiary has reached the remarkable milestone of more than 200,000 unique visitors daily to its network of sites." It continues, "Based upon the 200,000 daily unique visitor number that Powerclick is currently generating at $0.05 per unique click, Powerclick will produce in excess of $10,000 a day, $300,000 per month or nearly $4,000,000 a year in revenues."

Contrary to eConnect's claims, Freeshop CFO, John Wade stated yesterday, "none of our affiliates have generated over $1,000 per day" and "the top ten affiliates each generate about $100 per day."

eConnect reported on November 16, 1999 that it had purchased the online gambling site "777WINS.com" for 7 million shares of eConnect stock. eConnect reported that this gambling site produced revenue of $100,000 per month and 9 month income of $338,000 during 1999, making it eConnect's largest income and revenue producing operation. However, eConnect's information officer stated yesterday the 777WINS.com operations had been shut down several months earlier and the shutdown had never been disclosed in a press release or in an 8K filing as required by the SEC. This would appear to be a direct violation of a consent decree eConnect signed due to prior failures to disclose information as required by SEC regulations.

On November 23rd, 1999 eConnect announced in a press release it had "signed a letter of Intent to acquire 50 percent of the Dominican Republic business of Top Sports SA, which currently owns and operates 12 Dominican land based licensed sports books which are generating $1,700,000 in yearly revenue." Yesterday, eConnect's Information Officer stated eConnect did not own any part of Top Sports SA instead, he said eConnect had an "alliance" with Top Sports SA in exchange for an unknown number of ECONNECT shares. This is direct contradiction to eConnect's Nov 23rd press release.

eConnect has issued several press releases promoting the revenue production of Top Sports, suggesting the revenue will in some way benefit eConnect. Three months after first announcing the Top Sports SA deal, eConnect has failed to file an 8K with the SEC disclosing the nature of eConnect's relationship with Top Sports SA. Currently investors do not know how Top Sports SA revenue will affect eConnect - if at all, or how many eConnect shares eConnect paid Top Sports SA. This would again appear to be a violation of SEC rules concerning disclosure of significant events, and a direct violation of eConnect's consent decree with the SEC.

In a press release dated March 7, 2000 eConnect describes the following cash pay system they claim to have developed, "With the final successful integration of all eConnect systems, eConnect will have the technology and resources to connect the entire financial world with the most efficient and secure technology in existence today. With its one-swipe, real-time pay/deposit systems, eConnect has now clearly established a leading position in the projected Trillion dollar industry of global Internet and retail cash payments." Contrary to eConnect's claims, other very well financed companies including Cybersource (CYBS) and Cybercash (CYCH) already perform very similar services for internet consumers.

According to eConnect's Information Officer, eConnect developed their cash pay system in an alliance with SafeTPay. Yesterday the owners of SafeTPay stated they developed and applied for patents covering the cash pay system eConnect proposed to use during their alliance. They also stated SafeTpay terminated all relationships with eConnect in early January 2000, after eConnect's contractual default.

Approximately two months after SafeTpay terminated the relationship, eConnect continues to promote SafeTpay's system. For example here in a February 29, 2000 SEC filing, where it appears they fraudulently used SafeTpay's name to sell stock to investors, eConnect states "the Company's eSecure SafeTpay system which allows people to make purchases and payments on-line. By simply swiping a major credit card through any of the Company's eSecure hardware products, the encryption processing systems provide the ultimate in current anti-piracy technology."

In a press release dated February 28, 2000 eConnect, announced they had "entered into a strategic alliance with Empire Financial Group Inc. to offer Internet stock brokerage firms and their clients the Instant Cash Trading Account (TM) system that utilizes an ATM card with PIN." Contrary to eConnect's claims, Donald Wojnowski, Vice President of New Business Development, at Empire Financial Group, stated the following. "We have no comment regarding eConnect other than we have not entered into a strategic alliance with eConnect. The only agreement we have is a confidentiality agreement to explore business possibilities. We did not approve the press release issued by eConnect."

UNEXPLAINABLE MARKET VALUATION

Using yesterdays closing stock price, eConnect's market capitalization was $2.3 billion and according to eConnect's consultant Robert Masters, eConnect has no commercially working hardware or software and no customers. By comparison, eConnect's competitor Cybersource, (CYBS), has a $1.3 billion market capitalization and over 1,200 customers including Amazon.com, Beyond.com, BUY.COM, Casio, Compaq Computer, Mercata.com, MotherNature.com, Nike.com, Priceline Rx.com, Remedy and Shopping.com. Another eConnect competitor Cybercash, (CYCH), has a market capitalization of $250 million, processed more than eight million transactions in February and has over 20,000 merchant customers include FatBrain.com, PalmPilot.com Reel.com, SmarterKids.com, Toysrus.com, and Vitamins.com.

For these reasons, Pluvia Securities Research issues a Strong Sell Recommendation on eConnect with a 6 month price target of under $1.00. We believe the significant discrepancy between our target price and the stocks current price represents an almost 100% downside risk to current holders of the stock. Pluvia Securities Research will maintain research coverage of eConnect and update future findings.

Pluvia Securities Research, their agents, associates, and or employees have investment positions consistent with the above-stated investment opinion.

CONTACT:
Pluvia Securities Research
Steve Pluvia, 801/554-6898
e-mail pluvia2@aol.com



To: M Vavolizza who wrote (5993)3/11/2000 1:56:00 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 18222
 
5. It appears Mr. Pluvia may be using the message boards to make a profit.. Additionally, the company has information that Mr. Pluvia has a history of similar actions and short selling of stock in Premier Laser and West Guard.

Premier Laser places workforce on unpaid leave


IRVINE, Calif., March 1 (Reuters) - Medical and surgical product maker Premier Laser Systems Inc <PLSIA.O> said on Wednesday that it has placed all but nine of its employees on unpaid leave in order to address short term liquidity issues.

"We regret having to take this step once again, but in order to preserve the company's cash in the near-term, we believe it is the best interest of Premier to take this action at this time," Michael Quinn, the company's chief executive officer, said in a statement.

17:51 03-01-00



To: M Vavolizza who wrote (5993)3/12/2000 7:31:00 PM
From: Pluvia  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18222
 
**OUR RESPONSE TO MANNY & ECNC re: WHO IS PLUVIA**

In an attempt to deflect our accusations of fraud against ECNC, Manny and eConnect have attacked the credibility of Pluvia rather than explain why eConnect has issued a slew of misleading and fraudulent press releases concerning every aspect of their business.

This is a tired, old tactic and we believe shows the desperation of eConnect to avoid the real problem they now face with the United States Securities Exchange Commission along with various other state and federal regulatory authorities.

Regardless, we will respond to the accusations Manny's made here Message 13166553 to resolve this issue once and for all.

1. Manny suggests eConnect cannot find any information regarding Pluvia or Pluvia Securities Research, including corporate information, securities licensing information or office location.

To this accusation we have the following response:

Pluvia & the Pluvia research organization have been doing securities fraud research on the internet since 1996 (see TLTK). Each and every time we release a research report accusing a company of fraud, we get responses like those we have all seen this weekend. Malicious attacks, slander, threats. Promises by posters we will be put in jail etc. Nothing new, it happens every time - check the threads of the other scam's we busted to verify.

For security reasons we operate under a cloak of anonymity. There are multiple persons performing research that is posted under the nom de plume "Pluvia". Nobody from ECNC will ever know who we are. We have always operated that way and always will. Please note: It is perfectly legal for us to operate from various offshore entities to provide ourselves with better anonymity. We do not confirm or deny that we do this, but we thought we might provide this information to you as food for thought. We suggest shareholders spend their time looking at the research we present rather than attacking the messenger. If our research does not hold up - obviously we have no credibility.

Unfortunately for Manny and ECNC, we do have a strong history of results. We have never accused a company of specific fraud and been wrong. Not once. Every single company we have accused of fraud has eventually gone under. That's a 100% rate of accuracy. But please don't take our word for it, check it out yourself below?

2. Manny also suggests we need to be licensed with some state or federal agency to provide our opinion about eConnect.

To this accusation we respond - HOGWASH. We refer eConnnect's obviously talent legal department to the portion of the 1st amendment concerning freedom of speech.

Now that those issues are resolved, we offer you a look at your history of scam busting and suggest when you are finished you re-read our research on eConnect. We believe the shareholders of eConnect stock risk losing almost 100% of their capital investment if they remain invested in eConnect stock.

Good luck and happy reading.

*********************

NOTE: there are other companies than these we have accused of fraud that have gone belly up, these are the few that are easiest for people to research.

1. TLTK Members of our team accused TLTK of issuing fraudulent press releases, and fraudulent accounting. We worked with the US and state attorney general, the enforcement division of the IRS and the SEC to bust this scam. In the end, 30+ criminal indictments concluded with convictions. All accusations were proven true.

Stock was $9ish when we accused the company of fraud, it was delisted, and now trades for a few pennies.

Subject 2765

**********************

2. PLSIA Begin around post 900 when PLSIA was trading $11-12? We organized a class action suit against the company which PLSIA lost, we accused the company of fraudulent accounting and issuing fraudulent press releases. The company's stock was halted for about 6 months, forced to restate their financials as they admitted the fraud, the CEO was fired, the last employees were recently let go and the company filed bankruptcy?
Subject 7600

Motley Fool article written describing how PLSIA tried to hire Westergaard to silence us, but the sham backfired on both PLSIA and Westergaard..
fool.com

**********************

3. CTRN, ECTS, IVHD, SMEK & MALB Our Research Group Shut Down A 5 Company Scam in 3 days? SI Thread we started and the complete investigation by our research group that led to the single largest trading halt in SEC history - 5 companies in one day? Big credit to Bear Down for making the key connection to the crim Tosto..
Subject 25226

Story written about the scam based on out research
msnbc.com

SEC CHARGES PETER LYBRAND (F/K/A) PETER TOSTO WITH MARKET MANIPULATION
Message 12965041

Altogether, Tosto faces a total of 55 years in federal prison, and $12 million in fines, plus restitution of any illegal profits, on the criminal charges.
msnbc.com

*******************

4. SBTK Our team accused SBTK of issuing fraudulent financials, fraudulent press releases, and failing to disclose significant events to shareholders, (FDA requirement to shutdown a plant - insiders sold 40 million in stock then announced the shutdown).

SBTK fights back at Pluvia. They persuading their investment banker - Robbie Stevens Bank Boston to issue a press release stating the Pluvia research is wrong, giving the stock a $34 price target. SBTK then issues a Dow Jones press release stating they are suing Pluvia for $90 million claiming we made false statements about the company in an attempt to drive down the price of SBTK's stock. SBTK has never served me with the suit..

Less than 60 days later the CEO is fired, new management announces they are in a "liquidity crisis", they cannot file their quarterly report, (admitting my accusations of fraud were true), they defaulted on $85 million dollars of debt, their auditor quit and pulled their opinion on the last 3 years of financials.

The stock was $25-$26 when we issued a sell rec on SBTK, it was delisted and now trades around 25 cents.

Our response to the Robbie Stevens Banc Boston Analyst who claimed my accusations of fraud were incorrect, then placed a BUY on the stock.
Message 11046991

Most recent details of SBTK?
Friday December 17, 5:22 pm Eastern Time
WILMINGTON, Del., Dec 17 (Reuters) - Medical technology company Sabratek Corp. filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in U.S. Bankruptcy Court here Friday.
No further details of the filing were available.

On Dec. 3, the Skokie, Ill.-based company revealed in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing that its independent auditor, KPMG LLC, informed the firm that its financial statements for the last three years could no longer be relied upon. The company was delisted from the Nasdaq in November and has endured a rocky 1999 that included missed debt interest repayments and the resignation of its chairman, vice chairman and several directors.

The company's troubles began in June when a shareholder charged the company with accounting fraud. (that would be Pluvia) At that point, shares of the company were trading over 20 on the Nasdaq under the symbol 'SBTK.'
On Nov. 3, the company said its shares now trade on the National Quotation Bureau Electronic Quotation Service under the symbol 'SBTKE.'



To: M Vavolizza who wrote (5993)3/12/2000 8:42:00 PM
From: Pluvia  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 18222
 
***CHALLENGE #4 FOR MANNY VAVOLIZZA AND ECNC***

I ACCUSE ECNC AND IT'S PROMOTERS WITH MAKING NUMEROUS FALSE MISLEADING AND FRAUDULENT PRESS RELEASES IN AN ATTEMPT TO DRIVE THE STOCK PRICE HIGHER, (**PUMP**), ALLOWING ECNC PROMOTERS AND INSIDERS TO **DUMP** SHARES TO MAKE A PROFIT.

THIS SCAM IS KNOWN AS A PUMP AND DUMP AND IS DEFINED BY THE US SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION HERE... sec.gov

I accuse ECNC of issuing numerous misleading and fraudulent press releases including:

1. A press release issued on March 3, 2000 where eConnect states, "Pilot Island Publishing, a wholly owned subsidiary of International Digital Holding (OTCBB:IDIG.O), and its PocketPay Joint Venture partner, eConnect (OTCBB:ECNC.O), have structured a licensing arrangement with PalmPilot to enable the first-ever wireless hand-held Internet terminal transactions.

Last week eConnect?s information officer and eConnect consultant Robert Masters stated no work had begun or was planned for the development of the ?PocketPay? product which is proposed to work on a Palm Pilot platform. Mr. Masters stated he did not expect any development to begin for months ? suggesting I should in fact ?forget about it? altogether. Both Mr. Masters and eConnect?s Information Officer stated that in reality anyone could claim to be developing a ?PocketPay? type product for Palm Pilot by simply going to palm.com and purchasing source code for the Palm platform.

We believe eConnect does not have the staff or money to develop this product. Furthermore, we believe this press release was nothing more than the ?Old Con Game? of trying to associate eConnect?s stock with the hottest stock name of the week ? which was PALM at that time, in an attempt to Pump the price of their stock so insiders and promoters could Dump. We believe eConnect never had any real plans to develop such a product.

MANNY - PLEASE SHOW THE SHAREHOLDERS PROOF THAT eConnect IS ACTUALLY DEVELOPING A ?POCKET PAY? PRODUCT AS THE MARCH 3rd PRESS RELEASE CLAIMS. dljdirect.com

This is a very simple question Manny. I await your response.