Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Petz who wrote (97986)	3/11/2000 10:14:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570954

Petz - Re: "3. Since the specifications for the XBox CPU state that it must have a 128K L1 cache, Intel will have more development expense than AMD to produce the chip" Where is the X-BOX spec and the section that specifies a 128K L1 cache? Paul

To: Petz who wrote (97986)	3/11/2000 10:20:00 PM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1570954

Petz - Re: "Take 2,3 together and Intel will be selling these CPU's to a new customer in a new market for less than the cost of production. They will be using their monopoly position in business computers to subsidize entry into a new market. This is the definition of illegal monopolistic action" Good. I hope BOTH you AND AMD sue Intel. Remember, if you lose, Intel has a RIGHT and a DUTY to its SHAREHOLDERS to countersue you when you lose, to recover DAMAGES and EXPENSES associated with the frivolous suit. I am totally shocked and abhorred that you AMDroids are taking this LOSS to Intel like a bunch of babbling, whining, snotty-nosed 8 year olds. I hope Jerry and his cohorts sit in their dark, rented offices and obsess over this loss - just like you 'droids - while Intel gets ready to clean AMD's clock in the high end with a massive build up of 1 GHz Coppermines and, in Q3/Q4, WILLAMETTEs ! Fasten your seat belt, PETZ - the roller coaster ride is just beginning. Paul