SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Deeber who wrote (52937)3/11/2000 2:50:00 PM
From: Anthony@Pacific  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
For over 18 months the stock has traded under 10 bucks,,its a lamp company..There is no way that the released news is worthy of investment at double the price..I believe whole heartedly that that ADLT intentionally misl;wed people intoi thinking that some division which they wrote off as a loss,, is now somehow related to the fiber optic sector,, they intend on using ity to coat wires and fibers ..Its not a high tech play and I'm sure that ADLT suddenly didnt dicover a compound that Dupont has missed..

The stock is overvalued But AOL and AMZN stayeh up way high for a long time...as do many other stocks...

From a tech stand point the stock had to sell of...Im sure ....Im not responsible for the drop in the stock..But over the next 6 months you should see a slow depreciation...

The mkt today is about getting eyeballs..the more eyeballs teh more interest that can be fabricated... we have a constantnumber of stocks out there growing only slowly and yet we have ever increasing dollar funds..athat is why we are seeing junk rising with no basis or any fundamental reason...

Its the way it is...soone ror later ..after trila and error ..these compnaies say the right thing at the right time.

and get a pop..

If you notice teh cover was posted publicly and in real time ..so what harm was done? NONE...anyone who liked the news .knew that I didnt see anymore downside potential and I covered at 13 based on how much hype the news might generate after the news,.,,since the compnay infact has over 1700 employees.,..

It was all real time ..Its not as if when teh stock hit 13, I screamed for everyone to sell inbto my buying, quite the contrary ..as soon as teh stock hit 13 I said I was buying it all back

some even told me thet bought it long..I just dont think they shopuld hold it long ..for very long.



To: Deeber who wrote (52937)3/11/2000 6:03:00 PM
From: E. Davies  Respond to of 122087
 
Grow up, ok?

Anthony's past personal history is not relevant one way or the other. What matters is that he happens to be a darn good trader with a nose for seperating truth from hype.

Does that mean that the market will always dutifully behave as he predicts? Of course not. Hype can go on far longer than anyone can imagine. Good stocks can also go unrecognized for many years.

He is kind enough to express an opinion (of course hoping for our help too) and is often right. Thats good enough for me to take into account what he says.

Thats all.
Eric



To: Deeber who wrote (52937)3/11/2000 7:20:00 PM
From: nihil  Respond to of 122087
 
The appropriate response to Deeber is for everyone who wishes to put him on ignore, which is exactly what I will do right now.