Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Janice Shell who wrote (24784)	3/11/2000 4:31:00 PM
From: marcos	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26163

Wow, lol. Clearly it wasn't Jeffrey who wrote that. Jeffrey can and does spell. Tooooo much something not good, lol ... yes this is a classic and warrants dissentious dissemination in its dissilient dissimilitude to the posts of its intended object, eh. You'd think people going to all the trouble to falsify evidence would use a dictionary, wouldn't you. But then, that would be you thinking, lol. Haven't been to rb for a long time but will make the effort asap ..... cheers

To: Janice Shell who wrote (24784)	3/11/2000 4:52:00 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 26163

Janice, I notice that the version of Jeff's post that you refer to is an obvious retyped copy, as opposed to a cut-'n-paste. Besides the blatant additions at the bottom, the "author" of the "evidence" mistyped the word "actually" in Jeff's real post. The "author" inadvertently dropped the letter "y" while retyping it, a foolish but fatal oversight. I may be wrong, but I believe that submitting false evidence to the court is a criminal offense, similar to, but not exactly the same as perjury. It doesn't matter that this case is/was civil in nature. If your inferences prove to be true, then this case has crossed the line from civil to criminal. I'll send you more later, in a non-public forum. KJC