To: E. Davies who wrote (20101 ) 3/12/2000 3:11:00 PM From: ld5030 Respond to of 29970
<<One point that he and everyone else has been beating home is that nobody seems to understand the goals of the company. Why is it so complex to everyone?>> It is a somewhat eclectic and multifarious plan--ISP, free ISP, delivery, content, narrowband portal, broadband portal, B2B, advertising, cable, DSP, greeting cards, chocolates, and on and on. But even as confusing as ATHM's gameplan has been, the more confusing behavior has been on the part of the market. The market only focuses on ATHM's relationship with T as if that is the only thing that will make or break the company. Open Access has only been vaguely defined, one agreement only for T, and only in 2 1/2 years. Legal pressure from AOL has subsided significantly. In the meantime subs are added at an accelerated pace. ATHM is one of the few dot coms to make a profit. Excite, long chastised on this thread, is working on ways to leverage the speed advantage. IMHO, the jury is not out on Excite until we see their broadband portal. And even if that portal has problems, Excite has first mover advantage for iterative improvement. The Fool's valuation argument is specious, at best. No one is doing what ATHM is doing. Even if they do not hit on all cylinders they will survive and thrive. As Eric has pointed out, the market is a popularity contest. I am betting that sooner or later the market will "get it" and ATHM will soar. In fact, although it is not kosher to mention, I have significantly increased my position. Faith without works is nothing. The best stock swoops down to pick you up and takes you for a ride into the stratosphere. We've seen the first part. KB has an interesting strategy for ATHM, that of a broadband distribution house. Frank Coluccio has suggested that they make a secondary offering and run FTTH into the heart of AOL/TWX territory. I would love to see either of these, but then again it adds to the eclecticism.