SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Bill Wexler's Dog Pound -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Koolaide who wrote (7170)3/12/2000 1:06:00 PM
From: Phil(bullrider)  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Koolaid,

Just prior to adding you to my ignore list, I reported you as a suspected multiple user. (a person with more than one screenname)

If you are not, I am sorry. If you are, it will cost you.

Although I don't believe GUMM to be a totally fraudulent company, I do believe the management to be guilty of promoting a basically useless cold remedy and making overzealous claims about it's effectiveness.

I am short GUMM, and have been for a while. I will stay short unless GUMM visits the $50's and stays there for a whole week.

Have fun,
Phil



To: Koolaide who wrote (7170)3/16/2000 7:13:00 PM
From: Pallisard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10293
 
Koolaide - ditto with VLNC. Wexler labeled it fraud and scam and said the mgmt was crooked. He and his elves shorted it all the way up from 6 to ~30+. Finally gave up in disgust, with great losses still protesting its viability, degrading its integrity, and belittling its potential, complaining that the idiots were driving the price and that only `smart' investors like himself really knew what was happening. (g)


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News