Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Elmer who wrote (98189)	3/12/2000 7:50:00 PM
From: Scumbria	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580641

Elmer, it is truly incredible the way these people think. If Intel chooses to compete with AMD they say Intel is being anti- competitive Unlike the Borg thread, this thread does not have a collective conciousness. Captain, your strategy of introducing disruptive thoughts into the collective is doomed to failure. Scumbria

To: Elmer who wrote (98189)	3/12/2000 8:42:00 PM
From: Dan3	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1580641

Re: it is truly incredible the way these people think... Elmer, do you really think Intel would be anything more than a second tier calculator chip and RAM manufacturer if IBM had selected the 68000 for the IBM PC instead of the 8088? Intel (and Microsoft) are creations of the Justice Department's hammering of IBM. Justice effectively split one monopoly off into three - allowing at least a breath of free enterprise into these markets. Intel and Microsoft were both chosen because they were considered by IBM to be unlikely to ever become significant competitors. Microsoft was run by a spoiled-rich-kid college-drop-out, Intel had a blatantly non-competitive chip compared to Motorola's 68000, and Intel's CPU group had just finished getting its clock cleaned by Zilog - a division of Standard Oil of New Jersey that made typewriters! No wonder why IBM figured they were less likely to wind up with any real competition from Intel than any other possible chip supplier. When the 286 came out, the IBM guys congratulated themselves on having made a brilliant selection. Ultimately, of course, a natural monopoly is a natural monopoly, and with (effectively)infinite resources available, Intel managed to produce some competitive chips. Same thing happened with Microsoft - the difference being that "the rich-kid dropout" turned out to be an almost psychotically fanatical competitor - but that's history we all know! Dan

To: Elmer who wrote (98189)	3/12/2000 11:58:00 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1580641

Paul it is truly incredible the way these people think. If Intel chooses to compete with AMD they say Intel is being anti- competitive. The only way they can see Intel being competitive is if Intel decides not to compete. It's truly incredible!!! EP, It must be awful for you hanging out here, huh? ted

To: Elmer who wrote (98189)	3/13/2000 2:38:00 AM
From: Paul Engel	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580641

Elmer - Re: "Paul it is truly incredible the way these people think. If Intel chooses to compete with AMD they say Intel is being anti- competitive. The only way they can see Intel being competitive is if Intel decides not to compete. It's truly incredible!!!" Don't you just love the FLip FLop that all the AMDroids did on this X-BOX? The X-BOX was the greatest thing since the invention of water - when the 'droids thought the AthWiper was the CPU of choice. Now the 'droids are all "dissin'" the X-BOX, and screaming BLOODY MURDER because Intel is truly a COMPETITOR and beat the pants off AMD in a head-to-head competition. Paul