SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: survivin who wrote (98383)3/14/2000 11:26:00 AM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 1570689
 
I really liked the conclusion on that one, s. From www7.tomshardware.com

The Giga Performance Battle is ending with interesting results. Intel's Giga-Pentium III is leading in front of AMD's Giga-Athlon in the majority of benchmarks. However, Intel will still not like those benchmark numbers too much. It must be horrible for Intel's platform division to see how badly the old 440BX-chipset destroys i820. Even if we forget about the incredibly high scores of BX for a moment, there's still the excellent results of VIA's Apollo Pro 133A platform in all 3D games and office applications. It is certainly a shame that i840 was not included in those benchmark numbers, since it could have saved Intel's face. The reason for this however is Intel itself. In its paranoia against overclocking Intel's OR840 motherboard with the i840 chipset comes equipped with a BIOS that wouldn't allow CPUs to run faster than 800 MHz. Intel could not send me a fix until now and the answer was "Giga Hertz systems are supposed to ship on i820 platforms. So far there is no plan to use Pentium III 1000 on the OR840 motherboard." Isn't that a typical Intel-answer? The fastest processor build by Intel is not supposed to run on the fastest platform that's officially available! Somebody understand Intel's logic!

"Intel's logic" is of course a recurring puzzle to me. Intel seems intent on doing AMD a big favor here. The BX still rules, but Intel is intent on consigning it to the scrapheap, while thrashing around with Rambus. The marchitecture/road map guys must really have a ton of RMBS options, good for them, not so good for the parent company.

Meanwhile, AMD's got to continue to execute with on-chip cache and better chipsets coming out on schedule. If they do, AMD will be in great shape, even if Intel quits handicapping themselves.

Cheers, Dan.