SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Road Walker who wrote (100841)3/14/2000 1:32:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Can't play a game and watch TV at the same time, yet they sell a few game players. For that matter you can't watch two different TV shows at the same time, thats why most folks have more than one TV.

And the kids get kicked off the game (with much complaining) when an adult wants to use the TV. The game player is an add on to the TV. You're wanting to replace two independent high-usage devices with one device, making their use mutually exclusive. My wife's already upset that I tie up the phone line so much and now I have to tell here she can't watch TV, VHS, or DVD either? Either that or I have to pay for a complete second unit with either the tuner I don't need or the extra resolution and computer guts I don't need.

At their essence, a TV and a PC are the same thing, a screen that displays information and entertainment. The guts and interface are presently different, it will be more cost and use efficient if they can be made the same. And capitalism loves efficiency.

No, they're not the same. A computer monitor is a much higher resolution device than a TV screen and costs much more per screen inch. If I watch a DVD on my computer I have to reduce the resolution to 800 x 600 so that the player doesn't duplicate lines to fill the screen resulting in a crappy picture. Having a device with the resolution capability of a computer monitor is an expensive overkill for a TV/VHS/DVD signal. Only HDTV's highest resolutions approach that of a computer monitor.

Eventually the products will converge, so that you can choose your poison from any device within the home. I imagine at some point there will be a server in a closet somewhere, offering all functions to monitors located wherever throughout the home.

I agree with the concept, but it won't happen soon. Some problems:

The server would then have to have multiple tuners or you still wouldn't be able to watch two TV shows at once. Does this mean you'll need one tuner per screen in your house? Probably not, but you would end up paying for some that are rarely used.

The expense problem I assert above. You'd have to have a display with the highe$t re$olution needed for the most demanding task even if you're only going to watch an only VHS tape.

Your choices:

1) Expensive consoles all around. $$$. No cost savings there.

2) Dumb down the PC resolution. This is a step backwards and I doubt it would be acceptable to many people.

3) Stations usable by all devices but really suitable for one intended purpose. This would mean that you could access your Microsoft Word file through your big screen entertainment monitor but you probably wouldn't want to, or you could watch the DVD or HDTV on your computer interface station but you wouldn't if the big screen was available. This isn't much of an improvement over what we have today.



To: Road Walker who wrote (100841)3/14/2000 1:51:00 PM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
John, like it or not, your name was just on CNBC! You know this post you made, that is used on the SI "front page" right now: X-Box versus Playstation II are rated by John Fowler. CNBC just did a 15 or so minute special on Internet message groups, showed some Yahoo and some SI clips, and there it was. I think the only part that was actually on the screen was "by John Fowler."

Way to go John! Can I have your autograph?

What's next? When we have video on these things, someone's picture will be on TV? Maybe Virginia Gate can make a comeback for that. Actually, she ought to come back before that.

Tony



To: Road Walker who wrote (100841)3/14/2000 2:02:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 186894
 
John, I'm with Gerald and Gary on this one, probably to their chagrin. I've been extremely skeptical of "convergence" ever since I counted lines of text on a WebTV screen, near when it first came out. At its best, TV viewing is something you can share with other people. Who, exactly, is supposed to want to watch tv in the normal computer position of sitting with your face 2 feet away from the monitor? Who's supposed to want to watch somebody else surfing the web? Most things you do with a PC are solitary. You can have multiplayer games, of course, but they work much better on a per-person screen.

Cheers, Dan.



To: Road Walker who wrote (100841)3/14/2000 5:04:00 PM
From: Frank Ellis Morris  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 186894
 
Hurray for Bill !!When He wants to make the Markets to tank He does not fool
around.

OTOTOT >>Sometime soon, when everyone is blinking, MSFT will suddenly take off; that
is my hunch from the December experience where it moved from 92 to 115 in 3
days<<

A few more comments from Bill, Allen or Warren and you may see the stock
market down a couple thousand points. I have to give credit to the President for
causing the second largest drop in the Nasdaq's History. After being up almost
100 points it finishes down over 200. Now that guy is the greatest. I am pleased
that my stock portfolio had its largest decline ever. Move over Allen, Bill is my
hero. Maybe tomorrow he will say that the internet and technology is just a fad and really put Allen greenspan to shame with the maket results. Should we all vote Democrat for the next president next year??

Frank