To: longtom who wrote (6992 ) 3/14/2000 4:34:00 PM From: buffaloha Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 18222
Yes, longtom, I read many of your posts... I was sad to see you sour on the company, but perhaps part of this is you sold out well before the really big run. I know you had a falling out with the vision of Tom Hughes for some reason as you posted. You said so, as I recall. This did nothing to change my mind. I think you made a good profit. I didn't see you questioning those releases with any fervor before. I think from my review, you saw the opportunity to take some great profits and you did. But before the big run. I'd be upset too about selling all mine before the run, as I often thought to do like you, but you can't tell me the technology is not great. Also, are you not interested in buying again if it dips and the product works? Sure there were delays, sure there were problems. Tell me about a company without any. This is a great concept which checks out with Rogel, Pilot Island and my own review of patent info. If it gets beyond this disaster caused by the shorts' barrage, then I think it will do very well. My own suspicion is this has to do with the SEC questioning the gambling sites and revenues generated by foreign enterprises. It was made clear early on that the main guys are not that hot about the gambling angle, but they need to make some revenues to get this product off the ground. It is tough raising money to fund a new venture. Put yourself in the company's shoes. If you had a great idea and wanted to bring it to market, you would likely think it was a lot easier than it really is. I can only feel for these guys as I have seen many many new entrepreneurs deal with an insane maze of regulations and red tape. I hope ECNC can get through it all. Nothing I have ever seen demonstrated to me that your pal Manny had any dishonesty in him. You have to admit he was a bit overexuberant at times, but hey, this is a great concept. Good luck to you!