SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: H James Morris who wrote (96423)3/14/2000 6:39:00 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
H James: "blaming it on the bio-techs". Not me. I'm blaming it on the need for the NAZ to test 4000. Look at today's tape, combined with yesterday, and tell me this is just a little problem about biotech -- not buying it HJ. Over the falls. Sell-em while you can.



To: H James Morris who wrote (96423)3/14/2000 6:53:00 PM
From: Tradegod  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 164684
 
Interesting article on inflation being double what we're being told:

newsmax.com

The U.S. Energy Information Administration has reported that retail
gas prices, for example, are up over 60 percent from last year?s
levels.

Despite these increases, and the enormous role played by oil and its
by-products in the economy, the CPI still is almost flatline.

In Europe, governments and the European Union have reported a
sudden rise in inflation due to oil price increases ? but the federal
government claims oil prices have had little effect on inflation.

In December 1999 the annualized rate of inflation was at 2.7
percent. By January 2000, the annualized change in CPI had
remained at 2.7 percent ? despite the fact that "energy" sector
forms the second largest part of the U.S. GDP, just after health
care costs.

Media Myth: "New Economy" Stopped Inflation

Rather than inquire into just how the government is compiling these
highly suspicious numbers, the major financial media has been
spinning for the administration.


Stories that appeared in the Wall Street Journal and the New York
Times business sections in December 1999 took the apologist line.

Both stories emphasized this theme: the "New Economy" and the
Internet had so dramatically structured the U.S. economy that oil
prices were just not such an important component of CPI.

It is true that the Internet and computers are restructuring economy,
but not dramatically enough to lessen the importance of oil. Just
look at the numbers.

Consider that total internet consumer spending amounted to a tiny
$5.3 billion in the fourth quarter of last year. Total U.S. retail sales
during the same period was a gigantic $771.7 billion.
Internet
spending was simply a drop in the bucket.

The Internet is growing, but the old-fashioned mail order catalogue
business does a brisk $100 billion in sales a year ? five times the
spending made on the Web.

Amazon.com, the most celebrated e-tailer, sold almost a $1 billion
worth of goods last year over the Internet. Most of it books. Still,
Internet book sales represent only 5 percent of the total U.S. book
market.

And though the economy is changing radically, it is still unclear how
the new economy will impact the demand for oil.

Oil is still needed to give electric power to computers on the Web,
to heat the warehouses used by companies like Amazon and fuel
the planes, trains, postal and UPS trucks that have been busy
delivering Internet orders.

Common sense indicates that a dramatic rise in oil prices, as we
have seen, leads to large increases in CPI.

Federal Government Fixed Numbers

Since the early 1990s, the federal government has been gradually
altering the way CPI is computed by making various adjustments

According to economist John Williams, who directs the Shadow
Bureau of Government Statistics, a private firm that monitors
government number crunching, the federal government has been
using several clever and questionable techniques to keep the stated
inflation rate low.

Mr. Williams estimates that the current annualized CPI is above 5
percent ? more than double the 2.4 percent annual rate reported by
the federal government.

To create a false and artificially low rate, Mr. Williams reveals,
government economists use the technique of "geometric weighting."

Mr. Williams states that geometric weighting "gives a lower
weighting over time to goods that are increasing in price." The first
year that geometric weighting was fully implemented was in 1999.

The thinking behind geometric weighting goes like this: if prices rise
on a brand name product, consumers just move to generic brands,
or use other types of products.

It?s a nice theory, but consider why such thinking might not apply
to real people. Gas prices have increased dramatically. Have
motorists stopped driving cars? Have they begun using buses?
Bicycles? Walking instead? The answers are likely no.

Quality adjustments are another way the government keeps the
stated inflation number low.

For example when the government required that an additive be put
into gasoline to make it cleaner, the CPI was adjusted to not reflect
the price increase that was directly related to the additive.

In other words, the end consumer saw higher prices, but because
the government thought they were getting a better product, they
shouldn?t think of this as inflation!

Other quality adjustments include government-mandated changes to
auto production such as the addition of catalytic converters. Mr.
Williams says these adjustments are "not legitimate if the buyer
doesn?t have any alternative. The buyers are stuck paying the
higher price."



To: H James Morris who wrote (96423)3/14/2000 6:54:00 PM
From: GST  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Japan's downturn unnerves investors around the globe
BY MICHAEL ZIELENZIGER
Mercury News Tokyo Bureau
TOKYO -- A major sell-off ricocheted across Asia on Monday and into high-technology stocks on Wall Street, after the Japanese government confirmed that the world's second-largest economy shrank by 1.4 percent during the final three months of 1999, showing the country is still in recession.

The dismal economic news served as something of a wake-up call to American high-tech investors who were looking for revived Asian economies to help boost exports of U.S.-made hardware and software to the Pacific Rim. The impact on Wall Street was greatest in the high-technology sector, as the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 18.31 points while the tech-heavy Nasdaq index fell 141.29 points, or 2.8 percent.

Japan's disappointing economic report also meant new worries for Prime Minister Keizo Obuchi, who must call a general election by mid-October. Only last week, opinion polls showed that less than 50 percent of voters support his ruling coalition.

Despite official assurances that signs of economic revival are finally in sight, the benchmark Nikkei stock average fell some 3 percent, or 560 points, after the government said Japan's gross domestic product contracted at an annual rate of 5.5 percent in the fourth quarter. In the previous quarter, Japan's economy shrank 1 percent.

The October-December decline was the biggest since the economy fell 2 percent in the spring of 1997 and the third-largest quarterly decline since the end of World War II.

There had been some expectations that the October-December period would show a decline, as the flow of tax money for public works projects dwindled and consumers curtailed spending. The government had toned down its optimistic predictions in recent weeks as evidence grew that growth had stalled.

But the downturn was far more severe than most economists had forecast and confirmed that Japan has not yet escaped its worst economic downturn in half a century. Officials blamed Y2K fears, smaller year-end bonuses and a sharp drop in exports for falling consumption. But they somewhat dismissed the significance of their own data, pointing to rising capital investment as a sign that economic recovery is imminent.

``Everyone knows consumption in January-March will be good,' Finance Minister Kiichi Miyazawa told reporters. ``The fact is the economy is clearly improving.'

But investors, who headed straight for the exits, apparently tuned out his positive spin.

The broader Topix index of Tokyo stocks fell 4.6 percent, as investor took profits out of the only sector that has been rising recently, high-tech and Internet companies. Markets in Seoul, South Korea; Manila, Philippines; Jakarta, Indonesia; and Hong Kong quickly followed suit, heading down sharply. The Taiwan market also suffered a record sell-off, amid growing concerns that a victory by a pro-Independence candidate in Saturday's presidential election could heighten friction with China. Later, the sell-off spread to Wall Street, where the technology-heavy Nasdaq index had reached a record high only Friday.

In a sense, the sharp stock-market decline in Tokyo showed that the realities of the ``old economy' could still drag down the optimism surrounding the new one.

Bullish foreign investors have bought into Japan's restructuring potential lately, bidding up the prices of stock in such ``new economy' sectors as cellular telephones and Internet business. But rising stock prices have encouraged the nation's old-line politicians to defer the painful restructuring its old-line manufacturers still require.

That was obvious in the Economic Planning Agency figures, which showed that a 5.8 percent decline in the winter bonuses traditionally paid to workers in December helped cut personal consumption by a steep 1.6 percent during the quarter.

But EPA head Taichi Sakaiya pointed to rising corporate profits, increasing machine orders and rising spending on information technology as signs that the worst of the country's economic woes was passing.

Sakaiya maintained that the economy still could reach Obuchi's goal of 0.6 percent annual growth for the fiscal year ending in March, especially because of rising sales of cellular phones, personal computers and Internet-related hardware.

Richard Katz, senior editor of the Oriental Economist, a newsletter published by Toyo Keizai, which tracks Japanese economic issues, had the opposite interpretation. ``One year after the recovery is said to have begun,' he said, ``we are virtually right back where we started from. So you have to ask yourself whether January-through-June wasn't just a pause in a single recession that started in 1997.'

Katz and other economists are worried that the performance of Japan's economy this year will roughly mirror last year's, with two consecutive quarters of growth followed by two quarters of decline. ``What this zigzag makes very clear is that when the government throws money at the economy, it grows, and when it doesn't throw money at the economy, it ceases to grow,' Katz said.

Jesper Koll, chief economist for Merrill Lynch in Tokyo, supported the government's positive views, saying, ``Business investment is indeed coming through. Capital expenditures are on a positive footing. I think for the year 2000, 1.8 percent GDP growth is in the cards in Japan.'

In a normal cycle of economic expansion, the 4.6 percent increases in private-sector investment described by the Japanese government would be seen as a leading indicator of economic growth, since they demonstrate that companies are investing in the future.

But Ronald Bevacqua, chief economist for Commerz Securities Japan noted that in today's bloated Japanese economy, increases in capital spending are coming ``at the expense of wages and employment,' because technology is displacing redundant workers.

Ultimately, these layoffs drag down consumer spending, which still accounts for more than 60 percent of Japan's economy.

``As long as that is the case, we can have a strong rebound in capital expenditures but still a weak overall recovery. That's exactly what I am forecasting,' Bevacqua said. ``I'm not ready to be a bull yet.'

The Obuchi government hoped that massive government spending, cheap home loans and tax cuts in the first half of the year would inspire enough confidence that the nation's fickle consumers would start spending. That would build momentum toward a self-sustaining recovery as the year progressed.

Now it appears that corporate spending will have to take up the slack.