Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : SOUTHERNERA (t.SUF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: baystock who wrote (5840)	3/16/2000 4:08:00 PM
From: Factfinder	Respond to of 7235

Another brilliant strategist no doubt. The skiing must be more appealing in Denver. My last experience with a move to the US was Abacan which never seemed to benefit from the move. Maybe better for management but at a cash cost to Shareholders. Still holding patiently but not impressed.

To: baystock who wrote (5840)	3/16/2000 8:09:00 PM
From: Confluence	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7235

Hello Ram Rao, I think what the new guy is trying to say is that, while TO is the mining finance capital of NA, Denver is number two. And when you run out of friends in option #1, what else is left? Its too bad that SUF has so much negative goodwill (is there a word for this?) created over the past couple of years. Perhaps some connections with SWC in Denver could prove helpful to SUF, especially when it comes to financing the project at Messina. Just my guess, Confluence