SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Fabeyes who wrote (50841)3/17/2000 5:10:00 PM
From: Steve Robinett  Respond to of 53903
 
--Fabeyes

After a 3 day blip at the end of February that pushed 64 Meg PC 100 SDRAM from its recent low Average Selling Price of $4.70 to its recent high of $6.46, SDRAM resumed its price erosion to today's ASP of $5.28, an 18% decline in the last 12 days--more than 1% per day. I don't read that as firming demand. I would read it as firming demand if someone let me underwrite MU's next debt issue.
Best
--Steve



To: Fabeyes who wrote (50841)3/17/2000 11:18:00 PM
From: DJBEINO  Respond to of 53903
 
Memory Sizzle
March 17, 2000 SEMICONDUCTORS

Richard L. Whittington (415) 627-2786; Industry Overview
rwhittington@bofasecurities.com

DJIA: 10678
S&P 500: 1470

Investors have it twisted around. The way to play memory this cycle is Flash
and SRAMs. That's where the sizzle's at. DRAM demand is certainly strong and
will likely get a seasonal boost again this summer, but the secular story is
rapidly rising Flash and SRAM content per cell phone.

The big beneficiaries of the as yet unappreciated Flash and SRAM macro-trend
are: AMD (AMD, $50.06, Strong Buy), Atmel (ATML, $50.06, Strong Buy){1},
Cypress (CY, $44.63, Strong Buy) and Integrated Device Technology (IDTI,
$39.75, Strong Buy){1}, each rated Strong Buy. ISSI (ISSI, $25.38, Buy){1},
rated Buy, is similarly poised to benefit. Price targets are no object, so
robust is the earnings power these companies' possess for the next several
years.

* Much like the GUI (graphical user interface) demand-pull of Windows 3.x,
95 and 98 throughout the early-mid 1990s, vast increases in feature
content such as data and color screens are boosting cell phone chip
requirements.

* DRAM use per PC (not servers), on the other hand, is rising when the cost
per bit is right, and much less from performance-pull as occurred last
cycle.

* Flash and SRAM content per system unit are going up nearly regardless of
price. This is a critical distinction and the key to vastly improved
profit margins for leading Flash and SRAM producers.

Of course, there is a bull story for DRAMs: PCs and servers sell like crazy
in response to high speed Internet access demand and, at the same time, major
DRAM maker Samsung diverts scarce capacity to SRAMs and Flash. We're certainly
sympathetic to Micron's low cost and performance leading attributes but feel
these are now well known.

On the other hand, leading Flash and SRAM producers AMD, ATML, CY and IDTI
are still given short shrift by the investment community and have yet to
produce the banner profits we think very likely in store for the next two or
three years. Relative to expectation, we believe this is the area in which
memory-oriented investors should concentrate.

Demand for Flash and SRAM is surpassing all expectation: Sony, for example,
is readying an array of internet access platforms which they believe will soak
up 15% of the world's Flash supply in 2001 - this from low single digits this
year. This means they will be bumping heads with the likes of Nokia, Ericsson
and Motorola all through the year trying to secure sources of supply.

Unlike these cell phone makers, Sony has few long-term arrangements on which
to fall back and will have to pay the market-clearing price. This is what
occurred in DRAMs last cycle, when large OEMs had to brute force their way with
suppliers, holding DRAM prices stable for 3 straight years - a period in which
falling producer costs translated into banner profits for the premier
producers.

Recent industry reports indicate that large Flash and SRAM suppliers are now
de-committing to tier one OEMs as the former find they've badly underestimated
demand for the next two years. Significant ongoing shortages are now
contemplated in these markets at least through the end of next year. Since
producers have yet to materially scale up their capital equipment orders, not
even placing needed upsides into the que yet, it is our conclusion that these
memory markets will remain tight, see higher mix ASPs and generate banner
profits well into 2002.

ragingbull.com



To: Fabeyes who wrote (50841)3/18/2000 10:31:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug  Respond to of 53903
 
fabs, you forgot #7.

"that depends on what you mean by 'tight.'" ;-)

maybe the supply of functional, non sleepy dram is "tight" ;-)

but remember this, if nothing else...

DEMAND FOR DRAM CONTINUES TO REMAIN STRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

ho ho ho ho ho!!!!!!!!!!!!!