Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : XYBR - Xybernaut -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rrufff who wrote (3372)	3/17/2000 8:03:00 PM
From: Jim Spitz	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6847

"Even worse, the lemmings who are coming out now rejoicing with Auric for one day's victory are joining his scalping parade. They are probably aliases well-aware that most of the shorts here are short from single digits and are desperate to get out whole." That is hole not "whole", but that is not important. What is important is that I know a LOT of shorts who joined the parade today and I assure you they weren't shorting from single digits. Many covered earlier today before the serious drop and then shorted AGAIN because the news was just TOO juicy to resist. Mr. Aloha's post says a LOT and it is ALL verifiable in the SEC documents and Bloomberg. A lemming I am not. I shorted because the news today was, well just too strong to ignore. I foresee single digits next week. Oh, yeah, then some of those shorts who had real foresight can cover those other shares, which, were probably averaged up or covered LONG ago, IMO. Stay in the Black! jimS

To: rrufff who wrote (3372)	3/20/2000 2:46:00 AM
From: danderso	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6847

Since I am not much interested in this and don't follow you or Auric, I should not have commented, as it tempts me to waste my time. Despite that: to clarify, the way you wrote about a price of 5 seemed to indicate you wanted to signal that you thought 8 never happened. I was simply pointing out that the stock did hit the high 7s according to the data I have access to, so 8 in the afterhours, as Truthseeker claimed, did not seem unreasonable to me.. At any rate, I am not being wishy washy, I am stating clearly that quoting 5 when high 7s hit seems to display an agenda. You guys go ahead and have fun with each other, I'm out of here.