SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: CDMQ who wrote (69240)3/18/2000 2:48:00 AM
From: Lin  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 152472
 
OFDM, this sound just like CDMA. The way I understand CDMA's advantage is it reduce the amount of guard band needed between channels so that we can use those bandwidth to transmit information. It also increase the amount of bandwidth reuse in the spacial division multiplexing scheme used in cell phone system. The information bandwidth really is limited. You can do multiplexing in polarization, time division, space division (cell phone), code division (frequency division, wavelength division), phase division, amplitude division. There are limited way to increase the information bandwidth with the available spectrum. Is this OFDM for real? Where is the "engineer"? Can you kick in your thought?



To: CDMQ who wrote (69240)3/18/2000 4:06:00 PM
From: foundation  Respond to of 152472
 
From reviewing the Wi-Lan Site, it appears clear to me that OFDM is a FIXED WIRELESS technology for business, and perhaps over time home networks.... Implied costs seem far in excess of the $40/month area now for cable modems, or seen in future for HDR...

If my understanding is correct, comparing OFDM to CDMA, HDR or for that matter GSM is comparing apples to oranges....

May be a fine technology, but.......