SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Scumbria who wrote (98931)3/18/2000 12:16:00 PM
From: Dan3  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1570548
 
Re: Is it time to buy Rambus puts? The premiums are way too high...

I check Rambus put prices every so often. That Rambus is beyond fully valued seems to be everyone's conclusion. To make any money on a Rambus put that isn't priced so high that most leverage is lost requires a price drop to 25% to 50% of the current price within a fairly short time (depending on the put). It's just so blindingly obvious that this stock is going to tank that everyone has already priced that into the put. Add to that the fact the majority of all Rambus shares have already been borrowed and sold short marketguide.com
and it seems to me that that moment hasn't yet come to grab rambus puts. Just one opinion of a very novice option trader.

Regards,

Dan



To: Scumbria who wrote (98931)3/18/2000 3:00:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh  Respond to of 1570548
 
That is interesting, Scumbria. This makes the architecture a little clearer, it's the SiS-style integration of north bridge+graphics chip. There is no reason in principle why this approach wouldn't work with the Athlon bus just as well as with the P6 bus. In practice, for this particular instance, it's probably unlikely, I assume Intel demanded a little something in return for getting raked over the coals on cost.

There does seem to be a granularity problem in getting a 128 bit bus off of 64mb worth of DDR SDRAM, though. 8 chips at 16bits in/out per chip is only 64 mbit/chip, which is maybe about standard density now, not 18 months from now. 4 chips at 32bits/chip is better, but 32 bits is a lot to drive off a conventional SDRAM chip, isn't it?

Cheers, Dan.